Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE,
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ziedonis, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Corporate Venture Capital as a Window on New Technologies: Implications for the Performance of Corporate Investors When Acquiring Startups

David Benson, Rosemarie H. Ziedonis

Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

bensond{at}umich.edu
rzied{at}umich.edu

Gaining a "window" on new technologies is a prominent motive for corporate venture capital (CVC) investing. Recent studies suggest that information gained through CVC-related activities can improve the internal R&D productivity of established firms. This study investigates an alternative means by which information gained through CVC investing could improve firm performance—by increasing the returns to corporate investors when acquiring startups. We provide new insights based on an event study of the returns to 34 corporate investors from acquiring 242 technology startups. Consistent with predictions drawn from the absorptive capacity literature, we find that the effect of CVC investing on acquisition performance hinges critically on the strength of the acquirer's internal knowledge base: as CVC investments increase relative to an acquirer's total R&D expenditures, acquisition performance improves at a diminishing rate. We also find that firms consistently engaged in venture financing earn greater returns when acquiring startups than do firms with more sporadic patterns of investing, even controlling for firm profitability, size, and acquisition experience. These findings suggest that corporate investors systematically differ in their abilities to derive added benefits from external venturing as acquirers of entrepreneurial firms.

Key Words: acquisitions; startups; innovation strategy; absorptive capacity



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. M. Knott and H. E. Posen
Firm R&D Behavior and Evolving Technology in Established Industries
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 352 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
L. Capron and W. Mitchell
Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 294 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
P. Puranam, H. Singh, and S. Chaudhuri
Integrating Acquired Capabilities: When Structural Integration Is (Un)necessary
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 313 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. Agarwal and C. E. Helfat
Strategic Renewal of Organizations
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 281 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.