This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mosakowski, E. Search for Related Content

Entrepreneurial Resources, Organizational Choices, and Competitive Outcomes

University of California, Los Angeles, The Anderson School, Box 951481, Los Angeles, California 90095

This paper examines the link between a firm's resources and its efficient organization form with a focus on entrepreneurial resources. Entrepreneurial resources are defined as the propensity of an individual to behave creatively, act with foresight, use intuition, and be alert to new opportunities. This paper assumes that these entrepreneurial resources can be distributed in two ways throughout the firm: they can be held by one or a few individuals—"individual entrepreneurial resources"—or they can be dispersed among a team of individuals—"team entrepreneurial resources." Agency theory is used to consider how various organizational characteristics—such as the assignment of decision responsibilities, incentives and risk bearing, the number of hierarchical levels, horizontal linking structures, mutual monitoring and bonding devices, and information systems—will differ in the individual and team entrepreneurial forms. Generally, the individual entrepreneurial form resembles the "classic entrepreneurial firm" (Fama and Jensen 1983) in which various decision making roles and risk bearing are performed by a single entrepreneur. The team entrepreneurial form is similar to what Bartlett and Ghoshal (1993) call "beyond the m-form." Responsibility for steps in the decision process is dispersed in the team form, and monitoring the decision process will occur at the organization's apex. The CEO will not make operational or strategic decisions; instead, he manages the internal market for managers and develops an organization's cultural context and information systems. Below the CEO level, team entrepreneurs are responsible for ratifying innovative decisions, and below this team entrepreneurs are responsible for initiating innovative decisions. After presenting these two entrepreneurial forms, this paper relates them to extant research on corporate entrepreneurship and organizational forms.

Key Words: Entrepreneurship; Agency Theory; Innovation; Organizational Forms

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. W.-c. Yeung Transnationalizing entrepreneurship: a critical agenda for economic geography Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 210 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-L. Hervas-Oliver and J. Albors-Garrigos The role of the firm's internal and relational capabilities in clusters: when distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation J. Econ. Geogr., March 1, 2009; 9(2): 263 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Foss The Strategic Management and Transaction Cost Nexus: Past Debates, Central Questions, and Future Research Possibilities Strategic Organization, May 1, 2003; 1(2): 139 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. J. Foss Selective Intervention and Internal Hybrids: Interpreting and Learning from the Rise and Decline of the Oticon Spaghetti Organization Organization Science, May 1, 2003; 14(3): 331 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. N. Brockmann and W. P. Anthony Tacit Knowledge and Strategic Decision Making Group Organization Management, December 1, 2002; 27(4): 436 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]