This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Inkpen, A. C. Articles by Dinur, A. Search for Related Content

Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures

Thunderbird, The American Graduate School of International Management, Glendale, Arizona 85306
School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122

The management and processing of organizational knowledge are increasingly being viewed as critical to organizational success. By exploring how firms access and exploit alliance-based knowledge, the authors provide evidence to support the argument that the firm is a dynamic system of processes involving different types of knowledge. Using data from a longitudinal study of North American-based joint ventures (JVs) between North American and Japanese firms, they address three related research questions: (1) what processes do JV partners use to gain access to alliance knowledge; (2) what types of knowledge are associated with the different processes and how should that knowledge be classified; and (3) what is the relationship between organizational levels, knowledge types, and the transfer of knowledge?

Although many generalizations have been drawn about the merits of knowledge-based resources and the creation of knowledge, few efforts have been made to establish systematically how firms acquire and manage new knowledge. Moreover, prior alliance research has not addressed in detail the nature of alliance knowledge and how knowledge is managed in the alliance context. The authors examine the processes used by alliance partners to transfer knowledge from an alliance context to a partner context. They identify four key processes—technology sharing, alliance-parent interaction, personnel transfers, and strategic integration—that share a conceptual underpinning and represent a knowledge connection between parent and alliance. Each of the four processes is shown to provide an avenue for managers to gain exposure to knowledge and ideas outside their traditional organizational boundaries and to create a connection for individual managers to communicate their alliance experiences to others.

Although all of the knowledge management processes are potentially effective, the different processes involve different types of knowledge and different organizational levels. The primary types of knowledge associated with each process are identified and then linked with the organizational level affected by the transfer process. From those linkages, several propositions about organizational knowledge transfer and management are developed. The results suggest that although a variety of knowledge management strategies can be viable, some strategies lead to more effective knowledge transfer than others.

Key Words: Organizational Knowledge; Learning; Joint Ventures and Alliances; Tacit Knowledge; Knowledge Management Processes

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. V. S. Kumar Differential Gains Between Partners in Joint Ventures: Role of Resource Appropriation and Private Benefits Organization Science, January 1, 2010; 21(1): 232 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Godkin and S. Allcorn Dependent Narcissism, Organizational Learning, and Human Resource Development Human Resource Development Review, December 1, 2009; 8(4): 484 - 505. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Du Chatenier, J. A.A.M. Verstegen, H. J.A. Biemans, M. Mulder, and O. Omta The Challenges of Collaborative Knowledge Creation in Open Innovation Teams Human Resource Development Review, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 350 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Oxley, R. C. Sampson, and B. S. Silverman Arms Race or Detente? How Interfirm Alliance Announcements Change the Stock Market Valuation of Rivals Management Science, August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1321 - 1337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Masini and L. N. Van Wassenhove ERP Competence-Building Mechanisms: An Exploratory Investigation of Configurations of ERP Adopters in the European and U.S. Manufacturing Sectors MSOM, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 274 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Kasper, M. Lehrer, J. Muhlbacher, and B. Muller Integration-Responsiveness and Knowledge-Management Perspectives on the MNC: A Typology and Field Study of Cross-Site Knowledge-Sharing Practices Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, February 1, 2009; 15(3): 287 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-F. Lin A stage model of knowledge management: an empirical investigation of process and effectiveness Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 643 - 659. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Standifer and A. Bluedorn Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models Human Relations, July 1, 2006; 59(7): 903 - 927. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Ranft and M. D. Lord Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation Organization Science, July 1, 2002; 13(4): 420 - 441. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. Ireland, M. A. Hitt, and D. Vaidyanath Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage Journal of Management, June 1, 2002; 28(3): 413 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hage and J. R. Hollingsworth A Strategy for the Analysis of Idea Innovation Networks and Institutions Organization Studies, September 1, 2000; 21(5): 971 - 1004. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. A. J. Van den Bosch, H. W. Volberda, and M. de Boer Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities Organization Science, September 1, 1999; 10(5): 551 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF]