This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elsbach, K. D. Articles by Principe, K. E. Search for Related Content

Averting Expected Challenges Through Anticipatory Impression Management: A Study of Hospital Billing

Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322

Existing theory and research on organizational impression management focuses on how spokespersons use remedial tactics, following image-threatening events, to put their organization in the best possible light. By contrast, little theory or research has considered how organizations use impression management tactics to avert undesirable responses to upcoming events. This paper uses a qualitative and inductive study of billing procedures at three large hospitals to develop theory about how organization members use impression management tactics to fend off specific, expected challenges to organizational practices that are ambiguously negative. We found that hospitals use anticipatory impression management tactics to: (1) distract, diminish, or overwhelm patients' attention to hospital charges; and (2) to induce emotions that lead patients to simplify their information processing of those charges. Hospitals appear to use such anticipatory obfuscations both to fend off patients' initial challenges and to prevent their existing challenges from escalating. We discuss these findings in terms of their contributions to theories of symbolic management, social influence, and routine service encounters.

Key Words: Organizational Impression Management; Obfuscation; Hospital Bills

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J. Phillips and Y.-K. Kim Why Pseudonyms? Deception as Identity Preservation Among Jazz Record Companies, 1920-1929 Organization Science, May 1, 2009; 20(3): 481 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C. Bolino, K. M. Kacmar, W. H. Turnley, and J. B. Gilstrap A Multi-Level Review of Impression Management Motives and Behaviors Journal of Management, December 1, 2008; 34(6): 1080 - 1109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Maitlis and H. Ozcelik Toxic Decision Processes: A Study of Emotion and Organizational Decision Making Organization Science, July 1, 2004; 15(4): 375 - 393. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. TROYER, C. W. MUELLER, and P. I. OSINSKY Who's the Boss?: A Role-Theoretic Analysis of Customer Work Work and Occupations, August 1, 2000; 27(3): 406 - 427. [Abstract] [PDF]