Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 8, No. 2, March-April 1997, pp. 109-125
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.8.2.109
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G.
Right arrow Articles by Shan, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network

Gordon Walker, Bruce Kogut, Weijian Shan

Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
J. P. Morgan, Hong Kong

The formation of a network is determined by the opposition of two forces. The first is the reproduction of network structure as a general social resource for network members. The second is the alteration of network structure by entrepreneurs for their own benefit. The idea of reproduction is a conventional one in organizational sociology but has taken on increased importance due to the work of Bourdieu and Coleman. In contrast, Burt stresses the entrepreneurship of individual agents in exploiting structural holes that lie between constrained positions. Though complementary, the theories of social capital and structural holes have fundamentally different implications for network formation.

This paper investigates these theories by examining empirically the formation of the interorganizational network among biotechnology firms. We propose that network structure determines the frequency with which a new biotechnology firm (or startup) establishes new relationships. Network structure indicates both where social capital is distributed in the industry and where opportunities for entrepreneurial action are located. The reproduction of network structure depends on how startups value social capital compared to these opportunities. The critical test is, consequently, whether new relationships reproduce or alter the inherited network structure. We find strong support for the power of social capital in reproducing the network over time.

Key Words: social network; social capital; structural holes; network formation; biotechnology



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Family Business ReviewHome page
P. Rodriguez, C. S. Tuggle, and S. M. Hackett
An Exploratory Study of How Potential "Family and Household Capital" Impacts New Venture Start-Up Rates
Family Business Review, September 1, 2009; 22(3): 259 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
R. Y.-Y. Hung, B. Y.-H. Lien, and G. N. McLean
Knowledge Management Initiatives, Organizational Process Alignment, Social Capital, and Dynamic Capabilities
Advances in Developing Human Resources, June 1, 2009; 11(3): 320 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. V. Shipilov
Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality, and the Relationship Between Structural Holes and Performance
Organization Science, January 1, 2009; 20(1): 85 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
R. Lee and O. Jones
Networks, Communication and Learning during Business Start-up: The Creation of Cognitive Social Capital
International Small Business Journal, October 1, 2008; 26(5): 559 - 594.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Information Systems ResearchHome page
G. C. Kane and M. Alavi
Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User-System Interactions
Information Systems Research, September 1, 2008; 19(3): 253 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
L. Rosenkopf and G. Padula
Investigating the Microstructure of Network Evolution: Alliance Formation in the Mobile Communications Industry
Organization Science, September 1, 2008; 19(5): 669 - 687.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
J. Bae and Jun Koo
Information loss, knowledge transfer cost and the value of social relations
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2008; 6(3): 227 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. Arya and Zhiang Lin
Understanding Collaboration Outcomes From an Extended Resource-Based View Perspective: The Roles of Organizational Characteristics, Partner Attributes, and Network Structures{dagger}
Journal of Management, October 1, 2007; 33(5): 697 - 723.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
J. Gluckler
Economic geography and the evolution of networks
J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2007; 7(5): 619 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. Nadkarni and V. K. Narayanan
The Evolution of Collective Strategy Frames in High- and Low-Velocity Industries
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 688 - 710.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
M. Gittelman
Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 724 - 741.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
B. Kogut, P. Urso, and G. Walker
Emergent Properties of a New Financial Market: American Venture Capital Syndication, 1960-2005
Management Science, July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1181 - 1198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
K. G. Provan, A. Fish, and J. Sydow
Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks
Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 479 - 516.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
G. Hoetker, A. Swaminathan, and W. Mitchell
Modularity and the Impact of Buyer-Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers
Management Science, February 1, 2007; 53(2): 178 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
J. J. P. Jansen, F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda
Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators
Management Science, November 1, 2006; 52(11): 1661 - 1674.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
A. V. Shipilov
Should you bank on your network? Relational and positional embeddedness in the making of financial capital
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2005; 3(3): 279 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. Owen-Smith and W. W. Powell
Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community
Organization Science, January 1, 2004; 15(1): 5 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
N. Nicolaou and S. Birley
Social Networks in Organizational Emergence: The University Spinout Phenomenon
Management Science, December 1, 2003; 49(12): 1702 - 1725.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
F. Adam and B. Roncevic
Social Capital: Recent Debates and Research Trends
Social Science Information, June 1, 2003; 42(2): 155 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
L. Rosenkopf and P. Almeida
Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility
Management Science, June 1, 2003; 49(6): 751 - 766.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
M. Zollo, J. J. Reuer, and H. Singh
Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances
Organization Science, November 1, 2002; 13(6): 701 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
J. Hagedoorn and G. Duysters
Learning in Dynamic Inter-Firm Networks: The Efficacy of Multiple Contacts
Organization Studies, July 1, 2002; 23(4): 525 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
R. L. Tung
Building Effective Networks
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2002; 11(2): 94 - 101.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
R. D. Ireland, M. A. Hitt, and D. Vaidyanath
Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage
Journal of Management, June 1, 2002; 28(3): 413 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
W. Tsai
Social Structure of "Coopetition" Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing
Organization Science, March 1, 2002; 13(2): 179 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
M. B. Arthur, R. J. DeFillippi, and C. Jones
Project-Based Learning as the Interplay of Career and Company Non-Financial Capital
Management Learning, March 1, 2001; 32(1): 99 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. S. Brown and P. Duguid
Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective
Organization Science, March 1, 2001; 12(2): 198 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
M. Gargiulo and M. Benassi
Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital
Organization Science, March 1, 2000; 11(2): 183 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
L. Steier and R. Greenwood
Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks
Organization Studies, January 1, 2000; 21(1): 163 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Y. Lewin, C. P. Long, and T. N. Carroll
The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms
Organization Science, September 1, 1999; 10(5): 535 - 550.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
P. P. Li
Towards a Geocentric Framework of Organizational Form: A Holistic, Dynamic and Paradoxical Approach
Organization Studies, September 1, 1998; 19(5): 829 - 861.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by INFORMS.