|
|
||||||||
Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7235
Knowledge-intensive firms are composed of multiple communities with specialized expertise, and are often characterized by lateral rather than hierarchical organizational forms. We argue that producing knowledge to create innovative products and processes in such firms requires the ability to make strong perspectives within a community, as well as the ability to take the perspective of another into account. We present models of language, communication and cognition that can assist in the design of electronic communication systems for perspective making and perspective taking. By appreciating how communication is both like a language game played in a local community and also like a transmission of messages through a conduit, and by appreciating how cognition includes a capacity to narrativize our experience as well as a capacity to process information, we identify some guidelines for designing electronic communication systems to support knowledge work. The communication systems we propose emphasize that narratives can help construct strong perspectives within a community of knowing, and that reflecting upon and representing that perspective can create boundary objects which allow for perspective taking between communities. We conclude by describing our vision of an idealized knowledge intensive firm with a strong culture of perspective making and perspective taking, and by identifying some elements of the electronic communication systems we would expect to see in such a firm.
School of Business Administration, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-1421
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. L. Hong and F. K. H. O Conflicting Identities and Power Between Communities of Practice: The Case of IT Outsourcing Management Learning, July 1, 2009; 40(3): 311 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lainema Perspective Making: Constructivism as a Meaning-Making Structure for Simulation Gaming Simulation Gaming, February 1, 2009; 40(1): 48 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Bartel and R. Garud The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation Organization Science, January 1, 2009; 20(1): 107 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Espedal In the Pursuit of Understanding How to Balance Lower and Higher Order Learning in Organizations Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2008; 44(3): 365 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Charreire Petit and I. Huault From Practice-based Knowledge to the Practice of Research: Revisiting Constructivist Research Works on Knowledge Management Learning, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 73 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hayes Institutionalizing change in a high-technology optronics company: The role of information and communication technologies Human Relations, February 1, 2008; 61(2): 243 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Swan, M. Bresnen, S. Newell, and M. Robertson The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation Human Relations, December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1809 - 1837. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Boland Jr., K. Lyytinen, and Y. Yoo Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 631 - 647. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Anderson, J. Park, and S. Jack Entrepreneurial Social Capital: Conceptualizing Social Capital in New High-tech Firms International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2007; 25(3): 245 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaiser, G. Muller-Seitz, M. Pereira Lopes, and M. Pina e Cunha Weblog-Technology as a Trigger to Elicit Passion for Knowledge Organization, May 1, 2007; 14(3): 391 - 412. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Katz and D. Te'eni The Contingent Impact of Contextualization on Computer-Mediated Collaboration Organization Science, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 261 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Majchrzak, S. L. Jarvenpaa, and A. B. Hollingshead Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters Organization Science, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 147 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Pavlou and O. A. El Sawy From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development Information Systems Research, September 1, 2006; 17(3): 198 - 227. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Faraj and Y. Xiao Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations Management Science, August 1, 2006; 52(8): 1155 - 1169. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Kellogg, W. J. Orlikowski, and J. Yates Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations Organization Science, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 22 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thompson Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice Organization Science, March 1, 2005; 16(2): 151 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kock The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution Organization Science, May 1, 2004; 15(3): 327 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor Organization Science, May 1, 2003; 14(3): 312 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Orlikowski Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing Organization Science, May 1, 2002; 13(3): 249 - 273. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hargadon and A. Fanelli Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations Organization Science, May 1, 2002; 13(3): 290 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Thomas, S. W. Sussman, and J. C. Henderson Understanding "Strategic Learning": Linking Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, and Sensemaking Organization Science, May 1, 2001; 12(3): 331 - 345. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kieser Trust as a Change Agent for Capitalism or as Ideology? A Commentary Organization Science, March 1, 2001; 12(2): 241 - 246. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |