Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 6, No. 4, July-August 1995, pp. 350-372
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.4.350
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boland, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tenkasi, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing

Richard J. Boland, Jr., Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi

Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7235
School of Business Administration, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-1421

Knowledge-intensive firms are composed of multiple communities with specialized expertise, and are often characterized by lateral rather than hierarchical organizational forms. We argue that producing knowledge to create innovative products and processes in such firms requires the ability to make strong perspectives within a community, as well as the ability to take the perspective of another into account. We present models of language, communication and cognition that can assist in the design of electronic communication systems for perspective making and perspective taking. By appreciating how communication is both like a language game played in a local community and also like a transmission of messages through a conduit, and by appreciating how cognition includes a capacity to narrativize our experience as well as a capacity to process information, we identify some guidelines for designing electronic communication systems to support knowledge work. The communication systems we propose emphasize that narratives can help construct strong perspectives within a community of knowing, and that reflecting upon and representing that perspective can create boundary objects which allow for perspective taking between communities. We conclude by describing our vision of an idealized knowledge intensive firm with a strong culture of perspective making and perspective taking, and by identifying some elements of the electronic communication systems we would expect to see in such a firm.

Key Words: knowledge work; organization learning; distributed cognition; communication systems



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
J. F. L. Hong and F. K. H. O
Conflicting Identities and Power Between Communities of Practice: The Case of IT Outsourcing
Management Learning, July 1, 2009; 40(3): 311 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
T. Lainema
Perspective Making: Constructivism as a Meaning-Making Structure for Simulation Gaming
Simulation Gaming, February 1, 2009; 40(1): 48 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
C. A. Bartel and R. Garud
The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation
Organization Science, January 1, 2009; 20(1): 107 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
B. Espedal
In the Pursuit of Understanding How to Balance Lower and Higher Order Learning in Organizations
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2008; 44(3): 365 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Charreire Petit and I. Huault
From Practice-based Knowledge to the Practice of Research: Revisiting Constructivist Research Works on Knowledge
Management Learning, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 73 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
N. Hayes
Institutionalizing change in a high-technology optronics company: The role of information and communication technologies
Human Relations, February 1, 2008; 61(2): 243 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. Swan, M. Bresnen, S. Newell, and M. Robertson
The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation
Human Relations, December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1809 - 1837.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. J. Boland Jr., K. Lyytinen, and Y. Yoo
Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 631 - 647.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
A. Anderson, J. Park, and S. Jack
Entrepreneurial Social Capital: Conceptualizing Social Capital in New High-tech Firms
International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2007; 25(3): 245 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. Kaiser, G. Muller-Seitz, M. Pereira Lopes, and M. Pina e Cunha
Weblog-Technology as a Trigger to Elicit Passion for Knowledge
Organization, May 1, 2007; 14(3): 391 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Katz and D. Te'eni
The Contingent Impact of Contextualization on Computer-Mediated Collaboration
Organization Science, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 261 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Majchrzak, S. L. Jarvenpaa, and A. B. Hollingshead
Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters
Organization Science, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 147 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Information Systems ResearchHome page
P. A. Pavlou and O. A. El Sawy
From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development
Information Systems Research, September 1, 2006; 17(3): 198 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. Faraj and Y. Xiao
Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations
Management Science, August 1, 2006; 52(8): 1155 - 1169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
K. C. Kellogg, W. J. Orlikowski, and J. Yates
Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations
Organization Science, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 22 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
M. Thompson
Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice
Organization Science, March 1, 2005; 16(2): 151 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
N. Kock
The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution
Organization Science, May 1, 2004; 15(3): 327 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
B. A. Bechky
Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor
Organization Science, May 1, 2003; 14(3): 312 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
W. J. Orlikowski
Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing
Organization Science, May 1, 2002; 13(3): 249 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Hargadon and A. Fanelli
Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations
Organization Science, May 1, 2002; 13(3): 290 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. B. Thomas, S. W. Sussman, and J. C. Henderson
Understanding "Strategic Learning": Linking Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, and Sensemaking
Organization Science, May 1, 2001; 12(3): 331 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Kieser
Trust as a Change Agent for Capitalism or as Ideology? A Commentary
Organization Science, March 1, 2001; 12(2): 241 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by INFORMS.