Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 20, No. 4, July-August 2009, pp. 740-758
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0430
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groysberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L.-E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Hiring Stars and Their Colleagues: Exploration and Exploitation in Professional Service Firms

Boris Groysberg, Linda-Eling Lee

Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
RiskMetrics Group, New York, New York 10005

bgroysbegr{at}hbs.edu
lindaeling.lee{at}riskmetrics.com

This paper examines exploration and exploitation in professional service firms by focusing on the individuals who carry out the exploration and exploitation activities. Specifically, we examine the performance of star security analysts who join new firms in exploration versus exploitation roles. We find that stars hired to explore (initiate new activities) experience a short- and long-term performance decline; by contrast, stars who join new firms to exploit (reinforce existing activities) suffer only a short-term drop in performance. Stars hired in exploration roles can preserve some of their performance by moving with a group of colleagues from the originating firm. Investors view the hiring of a star analyst as value-destroying for the hiring firm regardless of whether the firm is hiring to exploit or explore, but the negative reactions are economically more extreme for exploration hires. These findings indicate that, even at the individual level, probabilities of success in exploration activities are lower than in exploitation activities, thereby reinforcing the tendency toward exploitation.

Key Words: individual performance; firm performance; mobility; teams; exploitation and exploration; knowledge workers



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw, G. Probst, and M. L. Tushman
Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
Organization Science, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 685 - 695.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.