This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tripsas, M. Search for Related Content

Technology, Identity, and Inertia Through the Lens of "The Digital Photography Company"

Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
mtripsas{at}hbs.edu

Organizations often experience difficulty when pursuing new technology. Large bodies of research have examined the behavioral, social, and cognitive forces that underlie this phenomenon; however, the role of an organization's identity remains relatively unexplored. Identity comprises insider and outsider perceptions of what is core about an organization. An identity has associated with it a set of norms that represent shared beliefs about legitimate behavior for an organization with that identity. In this paper, technologies that deviate from the expectations associated with an organization's identity are labeled identity-challenging technologies. Based on a comprehensive field-based case study of the entire life history of a company, identity-challenging technologies are found to be difficult to capitalize on for two reasons. First, identity serves as a filter, such that organizational members notice and interpret external stimuli in a manner consistent with the identity. As a result, identity-challenging technological opportunities may be missed. Second, because identity becomes intertwined in the routines, procedures, and beliefs of both organizational and external constituents, explicit efforts to shift identity in order to accommodate identity-challenging technology are difficult. Given the disruptive nature of identity shifts, understanding whether technology is identity challenging is a critical consideration for managers pursuing new technology.

Key Words: technological change; organizational evolution; organizational identity; industry emergence

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Gulati and P. Puranam Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies Between Formal and Informal Organization Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 422 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. Eggers and S. Kaplan Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 461 - 477. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Salvato Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 384 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. E. Kim and J. M. Pennings Innovation and Strategic Renewal in Mature Markets: A Study of the Tennis Racket Industry Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 368 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Puranam, H. Singh, and S. Chaudhuri Integrating Acquired Capabilities: When Structural Integration Is (Un)necessary Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 313 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Agarwal and C. E. Helfat Strategic Renewal of Organizations Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 281 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF]