Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 20, No. 2, March-April 2009, pp. 352-367
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0332
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knott, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Posen, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Firm R&D Behavior and Evolving Technology in Established Industries

Anne Marie Knott, Hart E. Posen

Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

knott{at}wustl.edu
hposen{at}umich.edu

One of the key mechanisms of firms' strategic renewal is R&D, and a key driver of the intensity of R&D is industry context. A number of theories develop propositions linking industry factors to firm R&D behavior, but these theories lack consensus. To date, empirical tests have been unable to resolve the competing predictions because of lack of time-varying measures of technology. We create new measures for technology and then conduct a test of the competing theories. Our results indicate that the data best match a model of innovative behavior in which firms invest in R&D principally to regain eroded advantage rather than to pursue the new frontier.

Key Words: technological opportunity; appropriability; R&D



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
D. Benson and R. H. Ziedonis
Corporate Venture Capital as a Window on New Technologies: Implications for the Performance of Corporate Investors When Acquiring Startups
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 329 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
C. Salvato
Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 384 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
H. E. Kim and J. M. Pennings
Innovation and Strategic Renewal in Mature Markets: A Study of the Tennis Racket Industry
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 368 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
P. Puranam, H. Singh, and S. Chaudhuri
Integrating Acquired Capabilities: When Structural Integration Is (Un)necessary
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 313 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. Agarwal and C. E. Helfat
Strategic Renewal of Organizations
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 281 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.