This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Desai, V. M. Search for Related Content

Constrained Growth: How Experience, Legitimacy, and Age Influence Risk Taking in Organizations

Business School, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, Colorado 80217
vinit.desai{at}cudenver.edu

Poor performance indicates that an organization's routines are not well suited for its environment and prompts decision makers to search for solutions. However, results conflict regarding how this search process influences risk taking in organizations. Managers in some organizations facing actual or expected performance shortfalls tend to take risks, while managers in other poorly performing organizations avoid risky changes. This conflict is interesting because some level of risk taking appears necessary for organizations to remain competitive, adapt to their environment, and improve performance. This study examines several mechanisms that moderate risk taking following performance shortfalls. First, I draw from organizational learning theories to argue that organizations with limited operating experience are less buffered from failure, and hence that poor performance constrains risk taking at these organizations. Second, I argue that organizations with poor legitimacy are also less buffered, and hence that performance shortfalls also lead to risk aversion at these organizations. Third, I draw from structural inertia theory to suggest that older organizations are less able to support risk taking following performance shortfalls. A test of these hypotheses on the capacity expansion behavior of U.S. railroad companies generally supports these hypotheses, although the effect of age is weaker. The findings contribute to theories of organizational learning and to several perspectives in organization theory more broadly.

Key Words: organizational learning; failures; aspiration performance; risk taking; legitimacy; age; inertia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. N. Sullivan Competition and Beyond: Problems and Attention Allocation in the Organizational Rulemaking Process Organization Science, March 1, 2010; 21(2): 432 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Desai Do organizations have to change to learn? Examining the effects of technological change and learning from failures in the natural gas distribution industry Ind. Corp. Change, January 17, 2010; (2010) dtp048v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lampel, J. Shamsie, and Z. Shapira Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning Organization Science, September 1, 2009; 20(5): 835 - 845. [Abstract] [PDF]