This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mantere, S. Articles by Vaara, E. Search for Related Content

On the Problem of Participation in Strategy: A Critical Discursive Perspective

Hanken Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, FIN-00101, Helsinki, Finland, and Helsinki University of Technology, FIN-02015, Finland
Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, FIN-00101, Helsinki, Finland, and École de Management de Lyon, 69132 Lyon Ecully Cedex, France
saku.mantere{at}hanken.fi
eero.vaara{at}hanken.fi

We still know little of why strategy processes often involve participation problems. In this paper, we argue that this crucial issue is linked to fundamental assumptions about the nature of strategy work. Hence, we need to examine how strategy processes are typically made sense of and what roles are assigned to specific organizational members. For this purpose, we adopt a critical discursive perspective that allows us to discover how specific conceptions of strategy work are reproduced and legitimized in organizational strategizing. Our empirical analysis is based on an extensive research project on strategy work in 12 organizations. As a result of our analysis, we identify three central discourses that seem to be systematically associated with nonparticipatory approaches to strategy work: "mystification," "disciplining," and "technologization." However, we also distinguish three strategy discourses that promote participation: "self-actualization," "dialogization," and "concretization." Our analysis shows that strategy as practice involves alternative and even competing discourses that have fundamentally different kinds of implications for participation in strategy work. We argue from a critical perspective that it is important to be aware of the inherent problems associated with dominant discourses as well as to actively advance the use of alternative ones.

Key Words: strategy; discourse; participation; critical management studies; subjectivity