Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 18, No. 6, November-December 2007, pp. 989-1005
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0299
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tschang, F. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Balancing the Tensions Between Rationalization and Creativity in the Video Games Industry

F. Ted Tschang

Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178899, Republic of Singapore
tedt{at}smu.edu.sg

This paper investigates the forces that influence creativity in the video games industry. We adopt a qualitative approach to guide the development of grounded theory across multiple levels of analysis, including the industry (consisting of multiple actors), organizational, and individual creator levels. Our study shows that business and production interests currently drive the rationalization of video game production. There is a maturing trend, with product designs becoming well established as genres, and consumers and publishers desiring incrementally innovative games. This leads publishers to focus on acquiring intellectual property, and publishers and studios alike to make incrementally innovative sequels. The increasing complexity of products leads to further rationalization in their development. However, the need to satisfy consumers' continually evolving tastes and game developers' inclinations to be creative also creates tensions with these rational forces. Different actors balance these tensions differently. Studios may seek to balance these by shifting between more and less innovative products, by creating original intellectual property to increase their bargaining power with publishers, and by iterating and repositioning products during development to adapt them to the market. Publishers may enhance their portfolio by hiring highly creative designers into their stable. New products are created through combinative creativity, that is, the recombination of existing ideas from different sources into new products. The connection of combinative mechanisms with the balancing behavior at the firm level provides a means for understanding the evolution of innovative products and, therefore, industries.

Key Words: creativity; video game; creative industries; industry evolution; combinative innovation



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
H. Tsoukas
A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations
Organization Science, November 1, 2009; 20(6): 941 - 957.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
B. Townley, N. Beech, and A. McKinlay
Managing in the creative industries: Managing the motley crew
Human Relations, July 1, 2009; 62(7): 939 - 962.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
H. E. Kim and J. M. Pennings
Innovation and Strategic Renewal in Mature Markets: A Study of the Tennis Racket Industry
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 368 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
C. A. Bartel and R. Garud
The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation
Organization Science, January 1, 2009; 20(1): 107 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. K. Gupta, P. E. Tesluk, and M. S. Taylor
Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis
Organization Science, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 885 - 897.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.