|
|
||||||||
Department of Business Administration, Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, S 220 07 Lund, Sweden
This paper addresses human resources management (HRM) systems and practices in a large multinational management consultancy firm. The firm invests considerable resources in HRM, and is frequently praised by employees for its accomplishments in hiring, developing, and promotion. However, this general faith in HRM does not align particularly well with employees experiences and perceptions of the specific HRM practices in the firm. The paper critically interprets the meaning and the functions of the HRM system and the beliefs supporting it. The paper suggests a reinterpretation of HRM systems and practices based on a cultural-symbolic perspective. It introduces the concepts of excess ceremonialism, identity projects, and aspirational control to highlight and interpret the significance of organizational symbolism in accounting for the role of HRM systems and practices, and the various effects of HRM systems and practices on employee identity and compliance.
Department of Business Administration, Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, S 220 07 Lund, Sweden
mats.alvesson{at}fek.lu.se
dan.karreman{at}fek.lu.se
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Di Domenico and N. Phillips Sustaining the Ivory Tower: Oxbridge Formal Dining as Organizational Ritual Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2009; 18(4): 326 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Karreman and M. Alvesson Resisting resistance: Counter-resistance, consent and compliance in a consultancy firm Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1115 - 1144. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |