Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 18, No. 4, July-August 2007, pp. 547-559
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0265
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Millward, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Postmes, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Putting Employees in Their Place: The Impact of Hot Desking on Organizational and Team Identification

Lynne J. Millward, S. Alexander Haslam, Tom Postmes

Department of Psychology, School of Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7HX, United Kingdom
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, Devon EX4 4QG, United Kingdom
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, Devon EX4 4QG, United Kingdom

l.purvis{at}surrey.ac.uk
a.haslam{at}exeter.ac.uk
t.postmes{at}exeter.ac.uk

A study of employees in the finance industry tested the propositions (a) that work team identity is more salient than organizational identity when desks are assigned, whereas organizational identity is more salient when they are not; and (b) that this is partly because physical arrangements have a significant bearing on the way in which employees engage with the organization as well as who they are most likely to engage with (i.e., impacting on the type and focus of organizational participation). The study measured levels of work team and organizational identity in matched samples of employees (N=142) assigned to desks and not assigned (i.e., hot desked), as well as their perceptions of the use, importance, and effectiveness of electronic and face-to-face communication as indicators of different types of organizational participation. Results support the hypotheses. The perceived value of electronic communication also accounted for significant variance in organizational identification for all employees. Findings point to a number of practical implications relating to the use of hot desking in the workplace.

Key Words: hot desking; space management; organizational identity; team identity; participation communication



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
C. Debora Riantoputra
Know Thyself: Examining Factors That Influence the Activation of Organizational Identity Concepts in Top Managers' Minds
Group Organization Management, February 1, 2010; 35(1): 8 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 325 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.