Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 18, No. 3, May-June 2007, pp. 420-439
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0282
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavetti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rivkin, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

On the Origin of Strategy: Action and Cognition over Time

Giovanni Gavetti, Jan W. Rivkin

Harvard Business School, 237 Morgan Hall, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
Harvard Business School, 237 Morgan Hall, Boston, Massachusetts 02163

ggavetti{at}hbs.edu
jrivkin{at}hbs.edu

We develop a perspective on how managers search for a strategy. In the spirit of Cyert and March (1963), we aim for a perspective that reflects the reality of managerial behavior, that respects both the reasoning power of managers and the bounds on their rationality, and that permits organizations to change but within realistic limits. Our perspective employs the variable time to frame the question of strategy’s origins in a distinctive way. Over time, the cognitive and physical elements that make up a strategy become less plastic, while mechanisms to search rationally for a strategy become more available. This generates a fundamental tension in the origin of strategy: Managers struggle to understand their environment well enough to search rationally for an effective strategy before their firms lose the plasticity necessary to exploit that understanding. A focus on time allows us to synthesize and extend the evolutionary and positioning models of strategic search. Toward this end, we couple induction and deduction. The inductive part of the paper uses detailed observation of the search for a strategy at one firm to identify constructs that play a crucial role in strategic search. The deductive part steps beyond our focal firm and uses these constructs to derive theoretical propositions about the typical path of strategic search and the mortality associated with different approaches to search.

Key Words: strategic search; plasticity; rationality; analogy; evolutionary economics; positioning school; behavioral theory of the firm



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
W.-R. Chen
Determinants of Firms' Backward- and Forward-Looking R&D Search Behavior
Organization Science, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 609 - 622.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
L. Argote and H. R. Greve
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm--40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 337 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.