Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 18, No. 2, March-April 2007, pp. 165-180
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0242
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, L.
Right arrow Articles by Waguespack, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities

Lee Fleming, David M. Waguespack

Morgan Hall 485, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
Robert H. Smith School of Business, 4515 Van Munching Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-1815

lfleming{at}hbs.edu
dwaguesp{at}rhsmith.umd.edu

What types of human and social capital identify the emergence of leaders of open innovation communities? Consistent with the norms of an engineering culture, we find that future leaders must first make strong technical contributions. Beyond technical contributions, they must then integrate their communities in order to mobilize volunteers and avoid the ever-present danger of forking and balkanization. This is enabled by two correlated but distinct social positions: social brokerage and boundary spanning between technological areas. An inherent lack of trust associated with brokerage positions can be overcome through physical interaction. Boundary spanners do not suffer this handicap and are much more likely than brokers to advance to leadership. The research separates the influence of human and social capital on promotion, and highlights previously unexamined differences between brokerage- and boundary-spanning positions. Longitudinal analyses of careers within the Internet Engineering Task Force community from 1986–2002 support the arguments.

Key Words: brokerage; leadership; open source; careers; social networks



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
J. Henkel
Champions of revealing--the role of open source developers in commercial firms
Ind. Corp. Change, June 1, 2009; 18(3): 435 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
D. M. Waguespack and L. Fleming
Scanning the Commons? Evidence on the Benefits to Startups Participating in Open Standards Development
Management Science, February 1, 2009; 55(2): 210 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
A. E. Leiponen
Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications
Management Science, November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1904 - 1919.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. K. Gupta, P. E. Tesluk, and M. S. Taylor
Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis
Organization Science, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 885 - 897.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. F. Zammuto, T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D. J. Dougherty, and S. Faraj
Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization
Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 749 - 762.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.