This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Majchrzak, A. Articles by Hollingshead, A. B. Search for Related Content

Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters

Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
Center for Business, Technology and Law, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
majchrza{at}usc.edu
sirkka.jarvenpaa{at}mccombs.utexas.edu
aholling{at}usc.edu

In the aftermath of catastrophic events, when plans for organized and timely response break down, impromptu groups often emerge to provide disaster relief. Much remains to be learned about the internal dynamics of these emergent response groups whose representatives may include members from organizations with relief missions; private sector organizations offering resources; and private citizens with the information, relationships, or physical and mental stamina to help. Organizational theories have the potential to contribute to a better understanding of emergent response groups and how they efficiently coordinate knowledge, people, resources, tasks, and technology, thereby substantially improving disaster response for future catastrophes. We apply one organization science theory toward better understanding of these groups—transactive memory systems theory—which is a theory about knowledge coordination in groups. Our application of this theory to emergent response groups requires extending the theory in three ways: the role of expertise in task assignment, how groups function when credibility in member expertise cannot be validated, and how expertise is coordinated. By demonstrating how transactive memory systems theory can be extended to the unique operating conditions of emergent response groups, we hope to inspire organization science researchers to accept the challenge of adapting their theories to study this important problem of our time.

Key Words: emergence; tranactive memory systems; coordinating catastrophes

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kourula and S. Laasonen Nongovernmental Organizations in Business and Society, Management, and International Business Research: Review and Implications From 1998 to 2007 Business Society, March 1, 2010; 49(1): 35 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. E. Beck and D. A. Plowman Experiencing Rare and Unusual Events Richly: The Role of Middle Managers in Animating and Guiding Organizational Interpretation Organization Science, September 1, 2009; 20(5): 909 - 924. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Meikuan Huang A Conceptual Framework of the Effects of Positive Affect and Affective Relationships on Group Knowledge Networks Small Group Research, June 1, 2009; 40(3): 323 - 346. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Jarvenpaa and A. Majchrzak Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 260 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. F. Zammuto, T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D. J. Dougherty, and S. Faraj Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 749 - 762. [Abstract] [PDF]