Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 17, No. 5, September-October 2006, pp. 619-636
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0208
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kreiner, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sluss, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Identity Dynamics in Occupational Dirty Work: Integrating Social Identity and System Justification Perspectives

Glen E. Kreiner, Blake E. Ashforth, David M. Sluss

Department of Management, University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210165, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0165
Department of Management, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Box 874006, Tempe, Arizona 85287-4006
Department of Management, Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, 1705 College Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29208

glen.kreiner{at}uc.edu
blake.ashforth{at}asu.edu
dmsluss{at}moore.sc.edu

Ashforth and Kreiner (1999) documented how workers in so-called "dirty work" occupations were able to overcome threats to their social identities by engaging in the cognitive tactics of ideology manipulation and social weighting. This paper expands Ashforth and Kreiner’s work in three ways. First, we move beyond an exclusive focus on intense dirty work occupations by mapping the broader landscape of stigmatized work. Second, we examine how system justification theory and social identity theory—typically cast as competing mechanisms by which individuals and groups perceive their places in a social structure—can complement each other to tell a more complete story of how individuals and groups deal with stigmatized identities. Third, we consider how stigmatized workers experience identification, disidentification, and ambivalence as a result of conflicting occupational and societal influences.

Key Words: social identity theory; system justification theory; dirty work; stigma; identification; ambivalent identification; disidentification



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 325 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.