This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Levinthal, D. Articles by Rerup, C. Search for Related Content

Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2000 Steinberg-Dietrich Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6370
Richard Ivey School of Business, Organizational Behavior Group, University of Western Ontario, Office 1N70, 1151 Richmond Street North, London, Ontario, Canada
levinthal{at}wharton.upenn.edu
crerup{at}ivey.uwo.ca

An important new stream of organizational research has emerged in recent years that draws on the notion of mindfulness. At the same time, there is a long-standing body of work in the organizations literature that emphasizes the role of routine-driven, or less-mindful, behavior. We attempt to connect these two seemingly disparate literatures arguing that, at a performative level, important elements of less-mindful processes are necessary elements underlying mindfulness. In particular, we note the role of established action repertories that facilitate the response to novel stimuli and how routines and established role structures enable mindfulness to be sustained across time and the span of the organization. Similarly, we note important elements of mindfulness that underlie less-mindful behavior, highlighting in particular the role of mindfulness in interpreting one’s context so as to identify what constitutes appropriate action in a given circumstance and in interpreting outcomes that form the basis for processes of reinforcement learning. Although we emphasize the complementarity between the two perspectives, we also note points of tension regarding the opportunity costs of mindfulness and the theories’ implied normative claims.

Key Words: organizational learning; mindfulness; routines

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Valorinta Information technology and mindfulness in organizations Ind. Corp. Change, May 28, 2009; (2009) dtp027v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Salvato Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 384 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Rafaeli, Y. Sagy, and R. Derfler-Rozin Logos and Initial Compliance: A Strong Case of Mindless Trust Organization Science, November 1, 2008; 19(6): 845 - 859. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. T. Pentland and M. S. Feldman Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 781 - 795. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Volkoff, D. M. Strong, and M. B. Elmes Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 832 - 848. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Cohen Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine Organization Studies, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 773 - 786. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. C. Baum and K. B. Dahlin Aspiration Performance and Railroads' Patterns of Learning from Train Wrecks and Crashes Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 368 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. S. Adler and D. Obstfeld The role of affect in creative projects and exploratory search Ind. Corp. Change, March 24, 2007; (2007) dtl032v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Birnholtz, M. D. Cohen, and S. V. Hoch Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove Organization Science, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 315 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]