Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 17, No. 1, January-February 2006, pp. 22-44
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0157
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kellogg, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yates, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations

Katherine C. Kellogg, Wanda J. Orlikowski, JoAnne Yates

Organization Studies, MIT Sloan School of Management, E52-544, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Information Technology and Organization Studies, MIT Sloan School of Management, E53-325, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Communications, Information, and Organization Studies, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
kkellogg{at}mit.edu
wanda{at}mit.edu
jyates{at}mit.edu

In our study of an interactive marketing organization, we examine how members of different communities perform boundary-spanning coordination work in conditions of high speed, uncertainty, and rapid change. We find that members engage in a number of cross-boundary coordination practices that make their work visible and legible to each other, and that enable ongoing revision and alignment. Drawing on the notion of a "trading zone," we suggest that by engaging in these practices, members enact a coordination structure that affords cross-boundary coordination while facilitating adaptability, speed, and learning. We also find that these coordination practices do not eliminate jurisdictional conflicts, and often generate problematic consequences such as the privileging of speed over quality, suppression of difference, loss of comprehension, misinterpretation and ambiguity, rework, and temporal pressure. After discussing our empirical findings, we explore their implications for organizations attempting to operate in the uncertain and rapidly changing contexts of postbureaucratic work.

Key Words: knowledge; information technology; new organizational forms; work practices; trading zone; cross-boundary coordination



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 OrganizationHome page
V. P. Corona and F. C. Godart
Network-Domains in Combat and Fashion Organizations
Organization, March 1, 2010; 17(2): 283 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization ScienceHome page
A. Mutch
Technology, Organization, and Structure--A Morphogenetic Approach
Organization Science, March 1, 2010; 21(2): 507 - 520.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management LearningHome page
D. Geiger
Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing
Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 129 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
S. Woolgar, C. Coopmans, and D. Neyland
Does STS Mean Business?
Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 5 - 30.
[PDF]

Home page
 International SociologyHome page
P. Johnson, G. Wood, C. Brewster, and M. Brookes
The Rise of Post-Bureaucracy: Theorists' Fancy or Organizational Praxis?
International Sociology, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 37 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
R. Zeiss and P. Groenewegen
Engaging Boundary Objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the Subtleties of Layered Engagement
Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 81 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
A. Styhre
Management Control in Bureaucratic and Postbureaucratic Organizations: A Lacanian Perspective
Group Organization Management, December 1, 2008; 33(6): 635 - 656.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization ScienceHome page
R. F. Zammuto, T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D. J. Dougherty, and S. Faraj
Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization
Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 749 - 762.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization ScienceHome page
M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, and A. Salter
"In Case of Fire, Please Use the Elevator": Simulation Technology and Organization in Fire Engineering
Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 849 - 864.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Information Systems ResearchHome page
A. Malhotra, S. Gosain, and O. A. El Sawy
Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships
Information Systems Research, September 1, 2007; 18(3): 260 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization ScienceHome page
R. J. Boland Jr., K. Lyytinen, and Y. Yoo
Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 631 - 647.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization ScienceHome page
L. Argote and H. R. Greve
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm--40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 337 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
B. A. Bechky
Talking About Machines, Thick Description, and Knowledge Work
Organization Studies, December 1, 2006; 27(12): 1757 - 1768.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.