Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 17, No. 1, January-February 2006, pp. 132-149
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0176
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlsen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Organizational Becoming as Dialogic Imagination of Practice: The Case of the Indomitable Gauls

Arne Carlsen

SINTEF Technology and Society, Forskningsveien 1, Gaustad, 0314 Oslo, Norway
arne.carlsen{at}sintef.no

This paper explores the relationship between authoring of identities and organizational development through a case study of the 18-year history of a professional service firm. Drawing from process theory, narrative psychology, and practice approaches to identity, I outline a perspective on organizational becoming as dialogic imagination of practice. Conceived as such, authoring takes place as a continuous stream of suggestions of what practice is, has been, and could be, simultaneously addressing life enrichment and organizational development. Three forms of imagination of practice are identified as central in the development of the case organization: (1) the instantiating of project experiences as identity exemplars; (2) a powerful dramatizing of trajectories of practice, exemplified by use of the metaphor of the "Indomitable Gauls;" and (3) a subsequent reframing instigated by discontinuous changes in dominant activity sets. The three authoring forms are discussed in relation to organizational development and adaptation. Implications include increased attention to forward-looking authoring motives and hope, a reformulation of the identity question from "who are we?" to "what are we doing?" and a possible location of practices as belonging to stories beyond that of the organization.

Key Words: organizational change and development; becoming; identity; practice; imagination; authoring; process theory



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
J. P. Cornelissen, C. Oswick, L. Thoger Christensen, and N. Phillips
Metaphor in Organizational Research: Context, Modalities and Implications for Research Introduction
Organization Studies, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 7 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.