This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Howard-Grenville, J. A. Search for Related Content

The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context

Organizational Behavior Department, Boston University School of Management, 595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
jahg{at}bu.edu

Once regarded as stable and inflexible, organizational routines are increasingly seen as capable of being adapted to the situation at hand and a potentially important source of endogenous change in organizations. This paper considers why routines that are performed flexibly may nonetheless persist over time. Drawing on data from participant observation of a high-tech manufacturing company, I identify factors that contribute to both the flexibility and persistence of a routine. First, individuals and groups approach routines with different intentions and orientations, suggesting that agency shapes particular routine performances. Second, routine performances are embedded in an organizational context that, while it may not restrict the flexible use of a routine, may constrain its ongoing adaptation. Finally, accounting for the relative power of individuals sheds light on the interaction between agency and context in routine performance and explains why the actions of some individuals, but not others, can change routines. This paper draws on recent work that conceptualizes routines as ongoing accomplishments, and it extends it by identifying how actors and contexts shape both individual performances of routines and contribute to their persistence or change over time.

Key Words: organizational routines; agency; organizational change

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. C. Bruns Leveraging functionality in safety routines: Examining the divergence of rules and performance Human Relations, September 1, 2009; 62(9): 1399 - 1426. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Silberstang and M. London How Groups Learn:The Role of Communication Patterns, Cue Recognition, Context Facility, and Cultural Intelligence Human Resource Development Review, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 327 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hales and J. Tidd The practice of routines and representations in design and development Ind. Corp. Change, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 551 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Saka-Helmhout Agency-Based View of Learning within the Multinational Corporation Management Learning, July 1, 2009; 40(3): 259 - 274. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Salvato Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 384 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Langley Process thinking in strategic organization Strategic Organization, August 1, 2007; 5(3): 271 - 282. [PDF]

				P. S. Adler and D. Obstfeld The role of affect in creative projects and exploratory search Ind. Corp. Change, March 24, 2007; (2007) dtl032v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Wilts Identities and Preferences in Corporate Political Strategizing Business Society, December 1, 2006; 45(4): 441 - 463. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Steen, C. Coopmans, and J. Whyte Structure and agency? Actor-network theory and strategic organization Strategic Organization, August 1, 2006; 4(3): 303 - 312. [PDF]