This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lewis, K. Articles by Gillis, L. Search for Related Content

Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer

Department of Management, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station B6300, Austin, Texas 78712-0210
Department of Management, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station B6300, Austin, Texas 78712-0210
Department of Management, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station B6300, Austin, Texas 78712-0210
kyle.lewis{at}mccombs.utexas.edu
donald.lange{at}phd.mccombs.utexas.edu
lynette.gillis{at}phd.mccombs.utexas.edu

Knowledge embedded in a group’s structures and processes can be leveraged to create sustainable advantage for organizations. We propose that knowledge embedded with a transactive memory system (TMS) helps groups apply prior learning to new tasks and develop an abstract understanding of a problem domain, leading to sustained performance. We present a framework for understanding TMSs as learning systems that affect group learning and learning transfer, and we test the major outcomes of the framework in an empirical study. We found that groups with a prior TMS and experience with two tasks in the same domain were more likely to develop an abstract understanding of the principles relevant to the task domain—a critical factor for learning transfer in general. We did not, however, find strong support for our contention that a TMS facilitates learning transfer after experience with only a single task. Further examinations of our findings showed that the extent to which members maintained expertise across tasks influenced the degree of learning transfer, especially for groups whose members had previously developed a TMS with another group. Our findings show that a TMS has broader benefits beyond the task for which it first developed because a TMS affects members’ ability to apply prior learning and develop a collective, abstract understanding of the task domain. More generally, our study demonstrates that TMSs influence group learning and learning transfer. We discuss our study’s implications for practice and for TMS and group learning theories.

Key Words: learning; transactive memory

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Bresman External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study Organization Science, January 1, 2010; 21(1): 81 - 96. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Jackson and R. L. Moreland Transactive Memory in the Classroom Small Group Research, October 1, 2009; 40(5): 508 - 534. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Silberstang and M. London How Groups Learn:The Role of Communication Patterns, Cue Recognition, Context Facility, and Cultural Intelligence Human Resource Development Review, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 327 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Meikuan Huang A Conceptual Framework of the Effects of Positive Affect and Affective Relationships on Group Knowledge Networks Small Group Research, June 1, 2009; 40(3): 323 - 346. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. W. Woolley Means vs. Ends: Implications of Process and Outcome Focus for Team Adaptation and Performance Organization Science, May 1, 2009; 20(3): 500 - 515. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Mathieu, M. T. Maynard, T. Rapp, and L. Gilson Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 410 - 476. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Jarvenpaa and A. Majchrzak Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 260 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Prichard and M. J. Ashleigh The Effects of Team-Skills Training on Transactive Memory and Performance Small Group Research, December 1, 2007; 38(6): 696 - 726. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. F. Zammuto, T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D. J. Dougherty, and S. Faraj Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 749 - 762. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Espinosa, S. A. Slaughter, R. E. Kraut, and J. D. Herbsleb Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 613 - 630. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Argote and H. R. Greve A Behavioral Theory of the Firm--40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 337 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Dosi and L. Marengo Perspective--On the Evolutionary and Behavioral Theories of Organizations: A Tentative Roadmap Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 491 - 502. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Majchrzak, S. L. Jarvenpaa, and A. B. Hollingshead Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters Organization Science, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 147 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Haas Acquiring and Applying Knowledge in Transnational Teams: The Roles of Cosmopolitans and Locals Organization Science, May 1, 2006; 17(3): 367 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF]