Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 16, No. 3, May-June 2005, pp. 308-322
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Walsham, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Reconceptualizing and Managing Reputation Risk in the Knowledge Economy: Toward Reputable Action

Susan V. Scott, Geoff Walsham

Information Systems Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom
Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1AG, United Kingdom

s.v.scott{at}lse.ac.uk
g.walsham{at}jims.cam.ac.uk

Globalizing knowledge economies foster conditions that intensify the role and value of organizational reputation risk. In an enterprise-focused era, reputation is a key strategic construct that can act as a boundary object linking communities within and between organizations. Yet approaches to its management tend to be reactive and remain under the hold of industrial society principles. Definitions of reputation risk in the existing literature and the business community have a tendency to be static and asset oriented. We suggest that this contrasts sharply with insights on the social construction of knowledge that inform recent risk studies. Drawing on this critique, we argue that the ambivalence engendered by on-going processes of definition (responsibilities, boundaries, fact construction) characterizing the knowledge society demands a reconceptualization of reputation risk. We propose a reconceptualization of reputation risk that not only incorporates a more sophisticated view of reputation, but also acknowledges the role that risk and trust relations can play in its constitution. In addition to contributing to the theoretical development of reputation risk in the organization studies literature, we develop the notion of reputable action as a guiding principle for realizing active trust development in the practical management of reputation risk.

Key Words: reputation; risk; trust; reputation risk; reputation management; knowledge economy; globalization



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. L. Jarvenpaa and A. Majchrzak
Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks
Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 260 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.