| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Center for Work, Technology and Organization, Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4026
Geographically distributed teams are increasingly prevalent in the workplace, and research on distributed teams is ever more available. Despite this increased attention, we still know surprisingly little about how the dynamics of distributed teams differ from those of their collocated counterparts and how existing models of teams apply to this new form of work. For example, although it has been argued that distributed as compared with collocated teams have more severe conflicts that fester longer and resist resolution, few comparative studies investigate dynamics such as conflict in both distributed and collocated teams. In this study, we examine conflict, its antecedents, and its effects on performance in distributed as compared with collocated teams. Our goal is to understand how conflict plays out in distributed and collocated teams, thus providing insight into how existing models of conflict must be augmented to reflect the trend toward distributed work.
We report the results of a field study of 43 teams, 22 collocated and 21 distributed, from a large multinational company. As expected, the distributed teams reported more task and interpersonal conflict than did the collocated teams. We found evidence that shared identity moderated the effect of distribution on interpersonal conflict and that shared context moderated the effect of distribution on task conflict. Finally, we found that spontaneous communication played a pivotal role in the relationship between distribution and conflict. First, spontaneous communication was associated with a stronger shared identity and more shared context, our moderating variables. Second, spontaneous communication had a direct moderating effect on the distribution-conflict relationship, mitigating the effect of distribution on both types of conflict. We argue that this effect reflects the role of spontaneous communication in facilitating conflict identification and conflict handling.
Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142-1347
phinds{at}stanford.edu
markm{at}mit.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. B. O'Leary and M. Mortensen Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams Organization Science, January 1, 2010; 21(1): 115 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. N. Bazarova and J. B. Walther Attributions in Virtual Groups: Distances and Behavioral Variations in Computer-Mediated Discussions Small Group Research, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 138 - 162. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Pisani International Management Research: Investigating its Recent Diffusion in Top Management Journals Journal of Management, March 1, 2009; 35(2): 199 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Joshi, M. B. Lazarova, and H. Liao Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams Organization Science, January 1, 2009; 20(1): 240 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Korsgaard, S. Soyoung Jeong, D. M. Mahony, and A. H. Pitariu A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict Journal of Management, December 1, 2008; 34(6): 1222 - 1252. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Wakefield, D. E. Leidner, and G. Garrison Research Note--A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams Information Systems Research, December 1, 2008; 19(4): 434 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Wilson, M. Boyer O'Leary, A. Metiu, and Q. R. Jett Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close Organization Studies, July 1, 2008; 29(7): 979 - 1002. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Chattopadhyay, E. George, and A. D. Shulman The Asymmetrical Influence of Sex Dissimilarity in Distributive vs. Colocated Work Groups Organization Science, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 581 - 593. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Overby Process Virtualization Theory and the Impact of Information Technology Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 277 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Golden Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions Human Relations, November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1641 - 1667. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. F. Zammuto, T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D. J. Dougherty, and S. Faraj Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 749 - 762. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Cramton, K. L. Orvis, and J. M. Wilson Situation Invisibility and Attribution in Distributed Collaborations Journal of Management, August 1, 2007; 33(4): 525 - 546. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. F. Boh, Y. Ren, S. Kiesler, and R. Bussjaeger Expertise and Collaboration in the Geographically Dispersed Organization Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 595 - 612. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Espinosa, S. A. Slaughter, R. E. Kraut, and J. D. Herbsleb Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 613 - 630. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Pena, J. B. Walther, and J. T. Hancock Effects of Geographic Distribution on Dominance Perceptions in Computer-Mediated Groups Communication Research, June 1, 2007; 34(3): 313 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Connaughton and M. Shuffler Multinational and Multicultural Distributed Teams: A Review and Future Agenda Small Group Research, June 1, 2007; 38(3): 387 - 412. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Katz and D. Te'eni The Contingent Impact of Contextualization on Computer-Mediated Collaboration Organization Science, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 261 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
