Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 16, No. 3, May-June 2005, pp. 275-289
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, V. T.
Right arrow Articles by Levesque, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

With a Little Help from My Friends (and Substitutes): Social Referents and Influence in Psychological Contract Fulfillment

Violet T. Ho, Laurie L. Levesque

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798
Frank Sawyer School of Management, Suffolk University, 8 Ashburton Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02108

atwho{at}ntu.edu.sg
llevesqu{at}suffolk.edu

This study investigated employees’ choice of social referents and the impact of social influence on their beliefs of psychological contract fulfillment. Using data from a field study conducted with 99 employees in a research organization, we found that one’s referent choice varied with the domain of promise evaluated. When evaluating the organization’s fulfillment of organization-wide promises, employees’ referents were primarily coworkers with whom they had close direct ties, namely, friends and advice givers. On the other hand, when evaluating the fulfillment of job-related promises, employees’ referents were mainly fellow workers who could substitute for them and people with whom they had multiple relationships.

The effects of social influence also varied with the domain of promise evaluated. For organization-wide promises, employees’ fulfillment evaluations were similar to those of their friends. However, for job-related promises, their fulfillment evaluations were dissimilar to those of coworkers who played the dual roles of friends and substitutes.

This study advances psychological contracts research by demonstrating that third parties to the psychological contract can influence fulfillment evaluations. In turn, the effect of such influence is contingent on the domain of promises being evaluated and the nature of the networks. We discuss implications for research in psychological contracts, social networks and influence, and referent choice.

Key Words: psychological contract fulfillment; social network theory; social influence



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
S. van den Heuvel and R. Schalk
The relationship between fulfilment of the psychological contract and resistance to change during organizational transformations
Social Science Information, June 1, 2009; 48(2): 283 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
V. T. Ho, D. M. Rousseau, and L. L. Levesque
Social networks and the psychological contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligations
Human Relations, April 1, 2006; 59(4): 459 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.