Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 16, No. 1, January-February 2005, pp. 33-51
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0102
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adair, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Brett, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation

Wendi L. Adair, Jeanne M. Brett

Department of Management and Organizations Behavior, S.C. Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Department of Management and Organizations, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208

wla5{at}cornell.edu
jmbrett{at}kellogg.northwestern.edu

We propose a normative model of transactional negotiation in which cooperative and competitive behaviors wax and wane across four stages: relational positioning, identifying the problem, generating solutions, and reaching agreement. Based on a classic proposition of communicative flexibility in high-context cultures, we propose culture-specific dyadic movements within and across these stages. Our sample included 102 high-context dyads from Russia, Japan, Hong Kong, and Thailand; 89 low-context dyads from Germany, Israel, Sweden, and the United States; and 45 United States–Hong Kong and United States–Japan mixed-context dyads. Dyads negotiated a complex, 90-minute transaction with integrative potential. We audiotaped, transcribed, and coded their negotiations for sequences of information and influence behaviors. The unit of analysis was the action-response sequence. Results confirmed that the pattern of sequences varied across the four stages and the frequency of particular sequences varied with culture. We suggest that negotiators can use this model to manage the evolution and strategic focus of their negotiation, especially during the first two stages, when the use of influence-information sequences and reciprocal-information sequences generate the groundwork for joint gains.

Key Words: negotiation; culture; time; behavioral sequences



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J.-C. Usunier and N. Roulin
The Influence of High- and Low-Context Communication Styles On the Design, Content, and Language of Business-To-Business Web Sites
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2010; 47(2): 189 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
A. Dewulf, B. Gray, L. Putnam, R. Lewicki, N. Aarts, R. Bouwen, and C. van Woerkum
Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective
Human Relations, February 1, 2009; 62(2): 155 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
G. Brodowsky, N. Granitz, and B. Anderson
The Best of Times is Now: A study of the gay subculture's attitudes toward time
Time Society, September 1, 2008; 17(2-3): 233 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
Yunxia Zhu
From cultural adaptation to cross-cultural discursive competence
Discourse & Communication, May 1, 2008; 2(2): 185 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Rowe
Unfolding the Dance of Team Learning: A Metaphorical Investigation of Collective Learning
Management Learning, February 1, 2008; 39(1): 41 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
A. S. Tsui, S. S. Nifadkar, and Amy Yi Ou
Cross-National, Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior Research: Advances, Gaps, and Recommendations
Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 426 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.