Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 15, No. 6, November-December 2004, pp. 671-686
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rafaeli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vilnai-Yavetz, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations

Anat Rafaeli, Iris Vilnai-Yavetz

Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel

anatr{at}ie.technion.ac.il
yavetzir{at}tx.technion.ac.il

This paper documents emotion as integral to stakeholders' sense making of a key organizational artifact, demonstrating that emotion toward artifacts blends into emotion toward the organization. Multiple stakeholders were interviewed about an artifact of a large public transportation organization. Sense making of the artifact is shown to involve emotion in interpretations that consider three dimensions of the artifact—instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism. Instrumentality relates to the tasks the artifact helps accomplish, aesthetics is the sensory reaction to the artifact, and symbolism regards associations the artifact elicits. The analysis demonstrates that sense making of these three dimensions includes unsolicited emotion both toward the artifact and toward the organization. Emotion that surfaces in sense making of organizational artifacts is, thus, suggested to be what links interpretation of artifacts and attitudes toward organizations. This paper lays foundations for a theory of organizational artifacts that can guide both thoughtful research and effective management of artifacts in organizations.

Key Words: artifacts; instrumentality; aesthetics; symbolism; emotion



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Rafaeli, Y. Sagy, and R. Derfler-Rozin
Logos and Initial Compliance: A Strong Case of Mindless Trust
Organization Science, November 1, 2008; 19(6): 845 - 859.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
V. P. Rindova and A. P. Petkova
When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations
Organization Science, March 1, 2007; 18(2): 217 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
I. Vilnai-Yavetz and A. Rafaeli
Aesthetics and Professionalism of Virtual Servicescapes
Journal of Service Research, February 1, 2006; 8(3): 245 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
B. Edvardsson, B. Enquist, and R. Johnston
Cocreating Customer Value Through Hyperreality in the Prepurchase Service Experience
Journal of Service Research, November 1, 2005; 8(2): 149 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
I. Vilnai-Yavetz, A. Rafaeli, and C. S. Yaacov
Instrumentality, Aesthetics, and Symbolism of Office Design
Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2005; 37(4): 533 - 551.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.