This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tosi, H. L. Articles by Greckhamer, T. Search for Related Content

Culture and CEO Compensation

Warrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611–7165; Scuola di Direzione Aziendale dell' Universitá Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan, Italy; Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Jouy-en-Josas, France
Warrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611–7165
henry.tosi{at}cba.ufl.edu
thomas.greckhamer{at}cba.ufl.edu

The theory and research on chief executive officer (CEO) compensation tends to be dominated by assumptions and values reflective of those dominant in the national culture of the United States, where most of this work is done. This suggests that an underlying theme focuses on how CEO compensation is related to instrumental choices made in a competitive, capitalist culture. This study seeks to expand the understanding of CEO compensation by examining it in the context of other cultures, based on the premise that national culture plays a significant part in the nature of compensation strategies.

We relate cultural dimensions (uncertainty avoidance, power distance, individualism, and masculinity-femininity) developed by Hofstede (Hofstede 1980a, 2001) to several dimensions of CEO compensation. These dimensions are total CEO pay, the proportion of variable pay to total compensation, and the ratio of CEO pay to the lowest level employees. The main findings of our paper are (1) all of the different dimensions of CEO pay were related to power distance, leading us to infer that CEO pay in a culture is most reflective of the strength of the power structure in a society, and (2) total compensation and the ratio of variable pay to total pay are related to individualism.

We conclude that cultural dimensions can contribute to understanding cross-national CEO compensation. The implication of this conclusion is that there are different ways that CEO compensation fits into the cognitive schema of various cultures and, furthermore, that these cognitive schema vary across societies that affect the nature of the "cultural matrix into which [money] is incorporated" (Bloch and Parry 1989, p. 1). Moreover, our results imply that particular forms of CEO compensation do not mean the same thing in different cultures, but rather carry different symbolic connotations depending on the values dominant in a society. Thus, not only does the compensation structure of a firm within a culture have a symbolic meaning within organizations (e.g., Trice and Beyer 1993), but it can also be seen as an expression of deeper social values (Hofstede et al. 1990) that may differ across countries.

Key Words: culture; CEO compensation; Hofstede

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Cohen and D. Keren Individual Values and Social Exchange Variables: Examining Their Relationship to and Mutual Effect on In-Role Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Group Organization Management, August 1, 2008; 33(4): 425 - 452. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. Devers, G. McNamara, R. M. Wiseman, and M. Arrfelt Moving Closer to the Action: Examining Compensation Design Effects on Firm Risk Organization Science, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 548 - 566. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Cohen One Nation, Many Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Relationship Between Personal Cultural Values and Commitment in the Workplace to In-Role Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Cross-Cultural Research, August 1, 2007; 41(3): 273 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]