| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Management and Organization Department, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0808
Organizational forms involving more detailed contracts than are found in traditional spot market exchanges appear to be increasingly prevalent. There has been relatively little analysis, however, of the extent to which firms learn how to use contracts to manage their interfirm relationships over time. In this paper, we conduct a detailed case study of a time series of 11 contracts concluded during 1989–1997 between the same two partners, both of whom participate in the personal computer industry, to explore whether and how firms learn to contract. We find many changes to the structure of the contracts that cannot be fully explained by changes in the assets at risk in the relationship, and evidence that these changes are largely the result of processes in which the firms were learning how to work together, including learning how to contract with each other. The nature of this learning appears to have been quite incremental and local, that is, not very far sighted. We suggest how and when contracts might serve as repositories for knowledge about how to govern collaborations, and suggest some boundary conditions for this phenomenon. Our findings also provide implications for the debate about whether contracts have a positive or negative effect on interorganizational trust. We conclude with suggestions for future research.
Boston University School of Management, 595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
kmayer{at}marshall.usc.edu
nargyres{at}bu.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Bidwell Problems Deciding: How the Structure of Make-or-Buy Decisions Leads to Transaction Misalignment Organization Science, March 1, 2010; 21(2): 362 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. S. Vanneste and P. Puranam Repeated Interactions and Contractual Detail: Identifying the Learning Effect Organization Science, January 1, 2010; 21(1): 186 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Dushnitsky Entrepreneurial Optimism in the Market for Technological Inventions Organization Science, January 1, 2010; 21(1): 150 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Chen and A. Bharadwaj An Empirical Analysis of Contract Structures in IT Outsourcing Information Systems Research, December 1, 2009; 20(4): 484 - 506. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. T. Mahoney, A. M. McGahan, and C. N. Pitelis Perspective--The Interdependence of Private and Public Interests Organization Science, November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1034 - 1052. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Foss and M. Lorenzen Towards an Understanding of Cognitive Coordination: Theoretical Developments and Empirical Illustrations Organization Studies, November 1, 2009; 30(11): 1201 - 1226. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. D. Ryall and R. C. Sampson Formal Contracts in the Presence of Relational Enforcement Mechanisms: Evidence from Technology Development Projects Management Science, June 1, 2009; 55(6): 906 - 925. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. J. Stephens, J. Fulk, and P. R. Monge Constrained choices in alliance formations: Cupids and organizational marriages Human Relations, April 1, 2009; 62(4): 501 - 536. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Capron and W. Mitchell Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 294 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Cassiman and G. Valentini Strategic organization of R&D: the choice of basicness and openness Strategic Organization, February 1, 2009; 7(1): 43 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kretschmer and P. Puranam Integration Through Incentives Within Differentiated Organizations Organization Science, November 1, 2008; 19(6): 860 - 875. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G. Jacobides How Capability Differences, Transaction Costs, and Learning Curves Interact to Shape Vertical Scope Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 306 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Y. Baldwin Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms Ind. Corp. Change, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 155 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Poppo, K. Z. Zhou, and S. Ryu Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future Organization Science, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 39 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. H. Heimeriks, G. Duysters, and W. Vanhaverbeke Learning mechanisms and differential performance in alliance portfolios Strategic Organization, November 1, 2007; 5(4): 373 - 408. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Walker The incompleteness of research on firm boundaries Strategic Organization, August 1, 2007; 5(3): 227 - 236. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Cristina Costa and K. Bijlsma-Frankema Trust and Control Interrelations: New Perspectives on the Trust Control Nexus Group Organization Management, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 392 - 406. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. L. Vlaar, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda On the Evolution of Trust, Distrust, and Formal Coordination and Control in Interorganizational Relationships: Toward an Integrative Framework Group Organization Management, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 407 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. N. Pitelis A Behavioral Resource-Based View of the Firm: The Synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959) Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 478 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. L. Vlaar, F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda Towards a Dialectic Perspective on Formalization in Interorganizational Relationships: How Alliance Managers Capitalize on the Duality Inherent in Contracts, Rules and Procedures Organization Studies, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 437 - 466. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. J. Foss The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics Organization, January 1, 2007; 14(1): 29 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W.L. Vlaar, F. A.J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to Make Sense Organization Studies, November 1, 2006; 27(11): 1617 - 1638. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. Mayer and J. A. Nickerson Antecedents and Performance Implications of Contracting for Knowledge Workers: Evidence from Information Technology Services Organization Science, May 1, 2005; 16(3): 225 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
