This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maitlis, S. Articles by Ozcelik, H. Search for Related Content

Toxic Decision Processes: A Study of Emotion and Organizational Decision Making

Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, 2053 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z2
Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, 2053 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z2
sally.maitlis{at}sauder.ubc.ca
hakan.ozcelik{at}sauder.ubc.ca

This paper addresses the role of emotion in organizational decision making. Grounding our research in the decision process literature, we introduce the concept of "toxic decision processes": organizational decision processes that generate widespread negative emotion in an organization through the recursive interplay of members' actions and negative emotions. We draw on a longitudinal, qualitative analysis of six toxic decision processes to develop a model that describes the three phases—inertia, detonation, and containment—through which these processes unfold. Each phase is characterized by distinctive sets of interactions among decision makers and other organizational members, and by emotions such as anxiety, fear, shame, anger, and embarrassment, that shape and are shaped by these interactions. We show that toxic decision processes are triggered by issues that are sensitive, ambiguous, and nonurgent and identify several mechanisms that connect actors' emotions and actions, over time creating a toxic decision process that leads to the cumulative buildup and diffusion of toxicity. These mechanisms include the construction of a "danger zone" around the issue that is avoided by all parties, the spread of negative emotion through processes of empathetic transmission and emotional contagion, and the suppression of widespread negative emotion that leads to the development of a volatile emotional context for future decision making. This study has important implications for the decision process literature, revealing how the different lenses through which decision making is usually viewed are connected by the emotionality that runs through each of them.

Key Words: emotion; decision making; toxic

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. V. Gallos Learning From the Toxic Trenches: The Winding Road to Healthier Organizations--and to Healthy Everyday Leaders Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2008; 17(4): 354 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Bartunek, Zhi Huang, and I. J. Walsh The development of a process model of collective turnover Human Relations, January 1, 2008; 61(1): 5 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Stein Toxicity and the Unconscious Experience of the Body at the Employee--Customer Interface Organization Studies, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1223 - 1241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. S. Adler and D. Obstfeld The role of affect in creative projects and exploratory search Ind. Corp. Change, March 24, 2007; (2007) dtl032v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]