Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 15, No. 3, May-June 2004, pp. 295-309
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change

Martha S. Feldman

Department of Planning, Policy, and Design, 226G Social Ecology I, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-7075
feldmanm{at}uci.edu

In this paper I argue that understanding resources through a social practice perspective enables us to understand more about the role of resources in change. In particular, social practice theory enables us to view resources in context as mutable sources of energy rather than as stable things that are independent of context, and to analyze the reciprocal relationship between actions and resources as they change. This approach to understanding resources requires an elaboration on current social practice theory and provides a new way to understand organizational change. This perspective is used to show how resources transform in unexpected ways as a result of change in organizational routines and how this transformation of resources makes resistance to change difficult to predict.

Key Words: resources; organizational change; structuration theory; resistance; practice theory



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EvaluationHome page
J. C. Suarez-Herrera, J. Springett, and C. Kagan
Critical Connections between Participatory Evaluation, Organizational Learning and Intentional Change in Pluralistic Organizations
Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 321 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Education and Urban SocietyHome page
S. Conley and E. K. Enomoto
Organizational Routines in Flux: A Case Study of Change in Recording and Monitoring Student Attendance
Education and Urban Society, March 1, 2009; 41(3): 364 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. W. Quinn and M. C. Worline
Enabling Courageous Collective Action: Conversations from United Airlines Flight 93
Organization Science, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 497 - 516.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
D. Dougherty
Bridging Social Constraint and Social Action to Design Organizations for Innovation
Organization Studies, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 415 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. A. Howard-Grenville
Developing Issue-Selling Effectiveness over Time: Issue Selling as Resourcing
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 560 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
L. Argote and H. R. Greve
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm--40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 337 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
E. G. Foldy
Dueling Schemata: Dialectical Sensemaking About Gender
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2006; 42(3): 350 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
E. Naveh, O. Meilich, and A. Marcus
The effects of administrative innovation implementation on performance: an organizational learning approach
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2006; 4(3): 275 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. A. Howard-Grenville
The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context
Organization Science, November 1, 2005; 16(6): 618 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
G. Spreitzer, K. Sutcliffe, J. Dutton, S. Sonenshein, and A. M. Grant
A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work
Organization Science, September 1, 2005; 16(5): 537 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.