This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoegl, M. Articles by Gemuenden, H. G. Search for Related Content

Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study

Institute of Organization and Information Systems, Bocconi University, Viale Isonzo 23, 20135 Milano, Italy
Technical University of Berlin, Hardenbergstr. 4-5, HAD 29, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Technical University of Berlin, Hardenbergstr. 4-5, HAD 29, 10623 Berlin, Germany
martin.hoegl{at}uni-bocconi.it
katharina.weinkauf{at}wiwi.uni-karlsruhe.de
hans.gemuenden{at}tim.tu-berlin.de

Organizations increasingly set up multiteam projects for the development of highly complex products. While team research has emphasized the importance of team-internal processes for smaller scale projects, we know little about collaborative processes (especially between teams) in such large-scale projects. This study utilizes a multi-informant longitudinal research design on a product development project (39 teams, 36 months) in the European automotive industry investigating collaboration between and within teams. The results of the study demonstrate that interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork quality as rated by the team members at Time 1 (Month 12; end of concept phase) are significantly correlated to project managers’ ratings of overall team performance at Time 3 (Month 36; end of project). The process variables measured at Time 2 (Month 24; end of design phase) display generally weaker correlations with team performance at Time 3. Multiple regression analyses further detail the effects of collaborative processes within and between teams on different measures of team performance (i.e., overall performance, quality, budget, schedule). The results show that collaborative processes during the project have predictive properties in regard to later team performance and can serve as early warning indicators. Furthermore, the results of this study provide support for our hypotheses predicting positive relationships between interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork quality. Theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed.

Key Words: team-based organizations; collaboration; R&D projects

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Olma Physical Bergsonism and the Worldliness of Time Theory Culture Society, November 1, 2007; 24(6): 123 - 137. [PDF]

				R. D. Banker, I. Bardhan, and O. Asdemir Understanding the Impact of Collaboration Software on Product Design and Development Information Systems Research, December 1, 2006; 17(4): 352 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Schulze and M. Hoegl Knowledge Creation in New Product Development Projects Journal of Management, April 1, 2006; 32(2): 210 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hoegl and S. M. Wagner Buyer-Supplier Collaboration in Product Development Projects Journal of Management, August 1, 2005; 31(4): 530 - 548. [Abstract] [PDF]