Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 13, No. 6, November-December 2002, pp. 601-617
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.6.601.499
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elvira, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Not Just a Formality: Pay System Formalization and Sex-Related Earnings Effects

Marta M. Elvira, Mary E. Graham

INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, Fontainebleau Cedex, 77305 France, and the Graduate School of Management, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3125
School of Business, Clarkson University, P.O. Box 5790, Potsdam, New York 13699-5790

marta.elvira(insead.edu
grahamm(clarkson.edu

Drawing on neoclassical economic, internal labor market, and devaluation theories, we examine how the sex composition of jobs and the sex of individual workers affect earnings, depending upon the formalization of the pay type. Using personnel data for over 8,000 employees, we confirm the existence of a negative relationship between earnings and the proportion female in a job. We also find that for less-formalized pay types (cash incentive bonuses), sex-composition and individual-sex effects are larger than for more formalized pay (merit raises and base salary). Together, these findings support devaluation explanations, suggest that incentive bonuses may widen the earnings gap between women and men, and have implications for the design of pay structures in organizations.

Key Words: Sex Composition; Pay Formalization; Incentive Bonuses



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
L. DeHart-Davis
Can Bureaucracy Benefit Organizational Women?: An Exploratory Study
Administration Society, May 1, 2009; 41(3): 340 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
J. N. Baron, M. T. Hannan, G. Hsu, and O. Kocak
In the Company of Women: Gender Inequality and the Logic of Bureaucracy in Start-Up Firms
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 35 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
E. G. Foldy
Dueling Schemata: Dialectical Sensemaking About Gender
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2006; 42(3): 350 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
M. A. Belliveau
Blind Ambition? The Effects of Social Networks and Institutional Sex Composition on the Job Search Outcomes of Elite Coeducational and Women's College Graduates
Organization Science, March 1, 2005; 16(2): 134 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by INFORMS.