|
|
||||||||
Harvard Business School, Morgan Hall, Soldiers Field Park, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
This paper introduces the concept of knowledge networks to explain why some business units are able to benefit from knowledge residing in other parts of the company while others are not. The core premise of this concept is that a proper understanding of effective interunit knowledge sharing in a multiunit firm requires a joint consideration of relatedness in knowledge content among business units and the network of lateral interunit relations that enables task units to access related knowledge. Results from a study of 120 new product development projects in 41 business units of a large multiunit electronics company showed that project teams obtained more existing knowledge from other units and completed their projects faster to the extent that they had short interunit network paths to units that possessed related knowledge. In contrast, neither network connections nor extent of related knowledge alone explained the amount of knowledge obtained and project completion time. The results also showed a contingent effect of having direct interunit relations in knowledge networks: While established direct relations mitigated problems of transferring noncodified knowledge, they were harmful when the knowledge to be transferred was codified, because they were less needed but still involved maintenance costs. These findings suggest that research on knowledge transfers and synergies in multiunit firms should pursue new perspectives that combine the concepts of network connections and relatedness in knowledge content.
mhansen{at}hbs.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Gokpinar, W. J. Hopp, and S. M. R. Iravani The Impact of Misalignment of Organizational Structure and Product Architecture on Quality in Complex Product Development Management Science, March 1, 2010; 56(3): 468 - 484. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. P. Jansen, M. P. Tempelaar, F. A. J. van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms Organization Science, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 797 - 811. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tiwana Governance-Knowledge Fit in Systems Development Projects Information Systems Research, June 1, 2009; 20(2): 180 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. McFadyen, M. Semadeni, and A. A. Cannella Jr. Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine Organization Science, May 1, 2009; 20(3): 552 - 564. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Kane and M. Alavi Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User-System Interactions Information Systems Research, September 1, 2008; 19(3): 253 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bae and Jun Koo Information loss, knowledge transfer cost and the value of social relations Strategic Organization, August 1, 2008; 6(3): 227 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Raisch and J. Birkinshaw Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 375 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-S. Wong, V. T. Ho, and Chay Hoon Lee A Power Perspective to Interunit Knowledge Transfer: Linking Knowledge Attributes to Unit Power and the Transfer of Knowledge Journal of Management, February 1, 2008; 34(1): 127 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jashapara Moving beyond tacit and explicit distinctions: a realist theory of organizational knowledge Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 752 - 766. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Murray and S. O'Mahony Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science Organization Science, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 1006 - 1021. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Willem and M. Buelens Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2007; 17(4): 581 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Saraf, C. S. Langdon, and S. Gosain IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships Information Systems Research, September 1, 2007; 18(3): 320 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Schilling and C. C. Phelps Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation Management Science, July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1113 - 1126. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Foss The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics Organization, January 1, 2007; 14(1): 29 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mooradian, B. Renzl, and K. Matzler Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing Management Learning, December 1, 2006; 37(4): 523 - 540. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. P. Jansen, F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators Management Science, November 1, 2006; 52(11): 1661 - 1674. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-L. Hsiao, S. D.-H. Tsai, and C.-F. Lee The Problems of Embeddedness: Knowledge Transfer, Coordination and Reuse in Information Systems Organization Studies, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1289 - 1317. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Haas Knowledge Gathering, Team Capabilities, and Project Performance in Challenging Work Environments Management Science, August 1, 2006; 52(8): 1170 - 1184. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Salomon Spillovers to foreign market participants: assessing the impact of export strategies on innovative productivity Strategic Organization, May 1, 2006; 4(2): 135 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Sosa, S. D. Eppinger, and C. M. Rowles The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development Management Science, December 1, 2004; 50(12): 1674 - 1689. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization Management Science, March 1, 2004; 50(3): 352 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |