Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 13, No. 2, March-April 2002, pp. 109-127
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.2.109.535
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Repenning, N. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation Implementation

Nelson P. Repenning

Department of Operations Management/System Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
nelson{at}mit.edu

The history of management practice is filled with innovations that failed to live up to the promise suggested by their early success. A paradox currently facing organizational theory is that the failure of these innovations often cannot be attributed to an intrinsic lack of efficacy. To resolve this paradox, in this paper I study the process of innovation implementation. Working from existing theoretical frameworks, I synthesize a model that describes the process through which participants in an organization develop commitment to using a newly adopted innovation. I then translate that framework into a formal model and analyze it using computer simulation. The analysis suggests three new constructs—reversion, regeneration, and the motivation threshold—characterizing the dynamics of implementation. Taken together, the constructs provide an internally consistent theory of how seemingly rational decision rules can create the apparent paradox of innovations that generate early results but fail to produce sustained benefit.

Key Words: Implementation; Process Improvement; Commitment and Motivation; Simulation



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Rural ManagementHome page
C. Cannarella and V. Piccioni
Innovation Diffusion and Territorial Inertia
International Journal of Rural Management, October 1, 2007; 3(2): 181 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
E. Naveh, O. Meilich, and A. Marcus
The effects of administrative innovation implementation on performance: an organizational learning approach
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2006; 4(3): 275 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
W. K. Smith and M. L. Tushman
Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams
Organization Science, September 1, 2005; 16(5): 522 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. G. L. Romme
Unanimity Rule and Organizational Decision Making: A Simulation Model
Organization Science, November 1, 2004; 15(6): 704 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by INFORMS.