This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McKendrick, D. G. Articles by Carroll, G. R. Search for Related Content

On the Genesis of Organizational Forms: Evidence from the Market for Disk Arrays

Information Storage Industry Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0519
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
dmckendrick{at}ucsd.edu
carroll_glenn{at}gsb.stanford.edu

This article asks a basic question of organizational evolution: When and where will a new organizational form emerge? Using a definition of organizational forms as external identity codes, we focus on two answers drawn from contemporary organization theory. The first holds that formal institutions such as industry associations and standard-setting bodies will result in a taken-for-granted organizational form. The second answer contends that increasing organizational density (number of organizations) will generate a legitimated organizational form. As reported here, a historical case study of the disk array market and its associated technologies finds both arguments limited. Although significant collective activity in association building and standard setting occurs among disk array producers, these have not yet led to an organizational form. Similarly, an observed trajectory of organizational density showing rapid growth followed by stabilization has not yet generated an organizational form. In our view, the diversity of origins and other activities of those organizations operating in this market work against institutionalization of the disk array organizational form. We reason that if firms in the market derive their primary identities from other activities (implying that there are few highly focused firms deriving their primary identity from disk arrays), then the disk array producer identity cannot cohere into a code or form. This conclusion suggests a respecification of the legitimation component of the density-dependent model of organizational evolution.

Key Words: Organizational Form; Identity; Disk Drive Arrays; Form Emergence; Technological Change

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tripsas Technology, Identity, and Inertia Through the Lens of "The Digital Photography Company" Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 441 - 460. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Perretti, G. Negro, and A. Lomi E Pluribus Unum: Framing, Matching, and Form Emergence in U.S. Television Broadcasting, 1940-1960 Organization Science, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 533 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. M. Khessina and G. R. Carroll Product Demography of De Novo and De Alio Firms in the Optical Disk Drive Industry, 1983-1999 Organization Science, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 25 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. T. Hannan, J. N. Baron, G. Hsu, and O. Kocak Organizational identities and the hazard of change Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 755 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Hsu and M. T. Hannan Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms Organization Science, September 1, 2005; 16(5): 474 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Romanelli and O. M. Khessina Regional Industrial Identity: Cluster Configurations and Economic Development Organization Science, July 1, 2005; 16(4): 344 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. T. Hannan, L. Polos, and G. R. Carroll Cascading Organizational Change Organization Science, September 1, 2003; 14(5): 463 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]