Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 12, No. 5, September-October 2001, pp. 599-611
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.5.599.10094
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lampel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shapira, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Judgmental Errors, Interactive Norms, and the Difficulty of Detecting Strategic Surprises

Joseph Lampel, Zur Shapira

University of Nottingham, Business School, Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG8 1AE
Stern School of Business, New York University, 44 W. 4th Street, New York, New York 10012

joseph.lampel{at}nottingham.ac.uk
zshapira{at}stern.nyu.edu

The concept of strategic surprise has been used by writers on military strategy to explore the successful amplification of resources during battle. This paper applies the same concept to subcontracting relationships and develops a cognitive framework to explain the phenomenon of strategic surprises, using buyer-supplier relations as an example. We first examine the factors that produce vulnerability to strategic surprise in cooperative situations. Then, we explore the reasons why firms are caught by surprise in spite of their vigilance. We present a model representing false alarms and strategic surprises as judgmental errors. We argue that judgmental errors cause misinterpretation of evidence and a consequent sense of false security. Interactive norms, which exist in some industries and may be taken as proxies for enduring relationships, may increase the likelihood of misjudgment and strategic surprises.

Key Words: Strategic Surprises; Noncontractual Relationships; Heuristics; Norms; Trust



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. Lampel, J. Shamsie, and Z. Shapira
Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning
Organization Science, September 1, 2009; 20(5): 835 - 845.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
T. E. Beck and D. A. Plowman
Experiencing Rare and Unusual Events Richly: The Role of Middle Managers in Animating and Guiding Organizational Interpretation
Organization Science, September 1, 2009; 20(5): 909 - 924.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
C. Rerup
Attentional Triangulation: Learning from Unexpected Rare Crises
Organization Science, September 1, 2009; 20(5): 876 - 893.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
P. Puranam, B. C. Powell, and H. Singh
Due diligence failure as a signal detection problem
Strategic Organization, November 1, 2006; 4(4): 319 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by INFORMS.