Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 12, No. 3, May-June 2001, pp. 274-293
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.3.274.10106
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rivkin, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity

Jan W. Rivkin

Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Morgan Hall 239, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
jrivkin{at}hbs.edu

The complexity of a firm's strategy affects both the ease with which the firm can replicate the strategy in a new setting and the ease with which rivals can imitate it. Simple strategies are as readily imitated as replicated, and highly intricate strategies resist imitation and replication equally. At moderate levels of complexity, however, a wedge develops between the ease of replication and the difficulty of imitation, so long as the replicator has better information than the imitator about the original success. An agent-based simulation model clarifies the structural reasons that this is so. The model also shows how the wedge-maximizing level of complexity varies with the replicator's informational edge over the imitator.

The results help to pinpoint situations in which strategies requiring replication are likely to defy imitation and generate sustained competitive advantage. More generally, the analysis sheds light on the value of superior but imperfect information about good solutions to hard problems. Finally, the results suggest that a pattern long observed by organization scholars--that "loosely coupled organizations" are especially effective competitors--may arise for a very different reason than is normally posited.

Key Words: Replication; Imitation; Complexity; Interaction; Loose Coupling; Competitive Advantage



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Strategic OrganizationHome page
J. Bae and Jun Koo
Information loss, knowledge transfer cost and the value of social relations
Strategic Organization, August 1, 2008; 6(3): 227 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
H. Rahmandad
Effect of Delays on Complexity of Organizational Learning
Management Science, July 1, 2008; 54(7): 1297 - 1312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
D. G. Hoopes and T. L. Madsen
A capability-based view of competitive heterogeneity
Ind. Corp. Change, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 393 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. K. Ethiraj, D. Levinthal, and R. R. Roy
The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation
Management Science, May 1, 2008; 54(5): 939 - 955.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
R. J. Jensen and G. Szulanski
Template Use and the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer
Management Science, November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1716 - 1730.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
J. W. Rivkin and N. Siggelkow
Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration
Management Science, July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1068 - 1085.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. G. Winter, G. Cattani, and A. Dorsch
The Value of Moderate Obsession: Insights from a New Model of Organizational Search
Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 403 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. J. Lenox, S. F. Rockart, and A. Y. Lewin
Interdependency, Competition, and the Distribution of Firm and Industry Profits
Management Science, May 1, 2006; 52(5): 757 - 772.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
G. Gavetti
Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities' Development
Organization Science, November 1, 2005; 16(6): 599 - 617.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
K. K. Sinha and A. H. Van de Ven
Designing Work Within and Between Organizations
Organization Science, July 1, 2005; 16(4): 389 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
N. Siggelkow and J. W. Rivkin
Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity
Organization Science, March 1, 2005; 16(2): 101 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
S. Kaplan
The Seduction of Best Practice: Commentary on "Taking Strategy Seriously"
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2003; 12(4): 410 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. J. Leiblein
The Choice of Organizational Governance Form and Performance: Predictions from Transaction Cost, Resource-based, and Real Options Theories
Journal of Management, December 1, 2003; 29(6): 937 - 961.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
N. Siggelkow and D. A. Levinthal
Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation
Organization Science, November 1, 2003; 14(6): 650 - 669.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
J. W. Rivkin and N. Siggelkow
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Management Science, March 1, 2003; 49(3): 290 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by INFORMS.