Organization Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


ORGANIZATION SCIENCE
Vol. 11, No. 4, July-August 2000, pp. 387-403
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.387.14597
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, P.
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Stretching the Iron Cage: The Constitution and Implications of Routine Workplace Resistance

Pushkala Prasad, Anshuman Prasad

Department of Business Administration, School of Economics, Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, S 220 07 Lund, Sweden
Department of Management, University of New Haven, 300 Orange Avenue, West Haven, Connecticut 06516

pushkala.prasad{at}fek.lu.se
aprasad{at}charger.newhaven.edu

Organizational scholars have shown considerable interest in the rise of complex systems of organizational control, sometimes referred to metaphorically as the process of tightening the iron cage, as well as patterns of workplace resistance to it. More recently, the scholarly spotlight seems to have shifted from formal modes of employee resistance to more informal or routine forms of workplace resistance. This paper presents a detailed ethnographic account of informal resistance and its ability to limit managerial control in a health maintenance organization undergoing the computerization of its administrative functions. Our study adopts a more problematic approach to understanding routine resistance, tracing its discursive constitution in the workplace. Using the findings of an ethnographic study involving observation and interviews, we show how routine resistance was discursively constituted and how it limited organizational control in interesting and unexpected ways. This discursive constitution was achieved through (a) owning resistance, (b) naming resistance, and (c) designating indirect resistance. The paper also analyzes how these different discursive constructions limited managerial control by affirming autonomous self-identities, renegotiating roles and relationships, and reinterpreting dominant managerial discourses. Finally, broader implications for understanding routine resistance in organizations are drawn.

Key Words: Resistance; Discourse; Symbolism
History: Received: September 25, 1997;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
P. Zanoni, M. Janssens, Y. Benschop, and S. Nkomo
Guest Editorial: Unpacking Diversity, Grasping Inequality: Rethinking Difference Through Critical Perspectives
Organization, January 1, 2010; 17(1): 9 - 29.
[PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Learmonth
'Girls' working together without 'teams': How to avoid the colonization of management language
Human Relations, December 1, 2009; 62(12): 1887 - 1906.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
D. Karreman and M. Alvesson
Resisting resistance: Counter-resistance, consent and compliance in a consultancy firm
Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1115 - 1144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
P. M. Buzzanell and S. D'Enbeau
Stories of Caregiving: Intersections of Academic Research and Women's Everyday Experiences
Qualitative Inquiry, July 1, 2009; 15(7): 1199 - 1224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
A. Styhre
Management Control in Bureaucratic and Postbureaucratic Organizations: A Lacanian Perspective
Group Organization Management, December 1, 2008; 33(6): 635 - 656.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
P. Dick
Resistance, Gender, and Bourdieu's Notion of Field
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2008; 21(3): 327 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
H. M. Zoller and G. T. Fairhurst
Resistance leadership: The overlooked potential in critical organization and leadership studies
Human Relations, September 1, 2007; 60(9): 1331 - 1360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
O. Boiral
Corporate Greening Through ISO 14001: A Rational Myth?
Organization Science, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 127 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
G. M. Schwarz and B. M. Watson
The Influence of Perceptions of Social Identity on Information Technology-Enabled Change
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2005; 30(3): 289 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
O. Boiral
ISO 9000: Outside the Iron Cage
Organization Science, November 1, 2003; 14(6): 720 - 737.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by INFORMS.