This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bate, P. Articles by Pye, A. Search for Related Content

Towards A Culturally Sensitive Approach To Organization Structuring: Where Organization Design Meets Organization Development

School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham, 40 Edgbaston Park Road Birmingham B15 2RT, United Kingdom
School of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
School of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
s.p.bate{at}bham.ac.uk
khanr{at}capitagroup.co.uk
a.j.pye{at}bath.ac.uk

This article describes an holistic model of intervention geared to achieving transformational change by interweaving culture and structure through the warp and weft of leadership processes. That is, it brings together organization design and organization development by advocating a culturally sensitive approach to organization structuring. Our emphasis is on process throughout and our thesis is based on empirical evidence. We undertook a lengthy action research project (which we prefer to call "action ethnography") at a large hospital trust in England. In the process of elaborating this field study, we move from an organization which was seen to be "gridlocked" and to have "lost its steering capacity", through one which was bringing development and design together by way of pilot projects and transitional structures, to one where collective dialogue and debate finally led to some collective and sensible sensemaking.

Exploring this relationship between culture and structure enables us to put people back into design and with them, their meanings, aspirations and assumptions. It also means that we are careful to avoid detailing specific design choices or offering organizational archetypes: this article is primarily about the process issues that surround redesign rather than organization design per se, as indeed any redesign is ultimately highly specific and context-driven. Instead, however, we articulate a four-phase change model, focusing on the delicate processes by which to reframe the culture-structure relationship, enabling an organization to move towards fundamental change.

Key Words: Culture-Structure Relationship; Organization Development; Organization Design; Leadership Process; Organizational Change
History: Received: July 1, 1998;

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Graetz and A. C.T. Smith Changing forms of organizing in Australian public companies Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, December 1, 2009; 47(3): 338 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Sackmann, P. M. Eggenhofer-Rehart, and M. Friesl Sustainable Change: Long-Term Efforts Toward Developing a Learning Organization Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2009; 45(4): 521 - 549. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. O. Chao, S. Kavadias, and C. Gaimon Revenue Driven Resource Allocation: Funding Authority, Incentives, and New Product Development Portfolio Management Management Science, September 1, 2009; 55(9): 1556 - 1569. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. F. Latta A Process Model of Organizational Change in Cultural Context (OC3 Model): The Impact of Organizational Culture on Leading Change Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, August 1, 2009; 16(1): 19 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Lee and J.-H. Lee Time to Change, Time for Change: Time as a catalyst for organizational change Time Society, September 1, 2008; 17(2-3): 363 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Jelinek, A. G. L. Romme, and R. J. Boland Introduction to the Special Issue: Organization Studies as a Science for Design: Creating Collaborative Artifacts and Research Organization Studies, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 317 - 329. [PDF]

				A. G. L. Romme and I. C. M. Damen Toward Science-Based Design in Organization Development: Codifying the Process Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 108 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. L. Romme and G. Endenburg Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design Organization Science, March 1, 2006; 17(2): 287 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. E. Weick Organizational Design and the Gehry Experience Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2003; 12(1): 93 - 97. [PDF]