| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France
This paper explores the tension between two opposite views on how networks create social capital. Network closure (Coleman 1988) stresses the role of cohesive ties in fostering a normative environment that facilitates cooperation. Structural hole theory (Burt 1992) sees cohesive ties as a source of rigidity that hinders the coordination of complex organizational tasks. The two theories lead to opposite predictions on how the structure of an actor's network may affect his ability to adapt that network to a significant change in task environment. Using data from a newly created special unit within the Italian subsidiary of a multinational computer manufacturer, we show that managers with cohesive communication networks were less likely to adapt these networks to the change in coordination requirements prompted by their new assignments, which in turn jeopardized their role as facilitators of horizontal cooperation within a newly created business unit structure. We conclude with a discussion of the trade-off between the safety of cooperation within cohesive networks and the flexibility provided by networks rich in structural holes.
Università di Trento, Via Inama 5, 30100 Trento, Italy
martin.gargiulo{at}insead.fr
mbenassi{at}cs.unitn.it
History: Received: December 1, 1997;
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Dale and L. Newman Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development? Community Dev. J., January 1, 2010; 45(1): 5 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Shi, L. Markoczy, and G. G. Dess The Role of Middle Management in the Strategy Process: Group Affiliation, Structural Holes, and Tertius Iungens Journal of Management, December 1, 2009; 35(6): 1453 - 1480. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. L. Wright Domination in Organizational Fields: It's Just Not Cricket Organization, November 1, 2009; 16(6): 855 - 885. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Lee and O. Jones Networks, Communication and Learning during Business Start-up: The Creation of Cognitive Social Capital International Small Business Journal, October 1, 2008; 26(5): 559 - 594. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Bae and Jun Koo Information loss, knowledge transfer cost and the value of social relations Strategic Organization, August 1, 2008; 6(3): 227 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ballet, N. Sirven, and M. Requiers-Desjardins Social Capital and Natural Resource Management: A Critical Perspective The Journal of Environment Development, December 1, 2007; 16(4): 355 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Willem and M. Buelens Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2007; 17(4): 581 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Storberg-Walker and C. Gubbins Social Networks as a Conceptual and Empirical Tool to Understand and "Do" HRD Advances in Developing Human Resources, August 1, 2007; 9(3): 291 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Rhee The Time Relevance of Social Capital Rationality and Society, August 1, 2007; 19(3): 367 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Hoetker, A. Swaminathan, and W. Mitchell Modularity and the Impact of Buyer-Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers Management Science, February 1, 2007; 53(2): 178 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Willem, M. Buelens, and H. Scarbrough The role of inter-unit coordination mechanisms in knowledge sharing: a case study of a British MNC Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2006; 32(6): 539 - 561. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Willem and H. Scarbrough Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study Human Relations, October 1, 2006; 59(10): 1343 - 1370. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. T. Ho, D. M. Rousseau, and L. L. Levesque Social networks and the psychological contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligations Human Relations, April 1, 2006; 59(4): 459 - 481. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Mehra, A. L. Dixon, D. J. Brass, and B. Robertson The Social Network Ties of Group Leaders: Implications for Group Performance and Leader Reputation Organization Science, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 64 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. De Wever, R. Martens, and K. Vandenbempt The impact of trust on strategic resource acquisition through interorganizational networks:Towards a conceptual model Human Relations, December 1, 2005; 58(12): 1523 - 1543. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Shipilov Should you bank on your network? Relational and positional embeddedness in the making of financial capital Strategic Organization, August 1, 2005; 3(3): 279 - 309. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Borgatti and P. C. Foster The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology Journal of Management, December 1, 2003; 29(6): 991 - 1013. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. X. Molina-Morales, M. A. Lopez-Navarro, and J. Guia-Julve The Role of Local Institutions as Intermediary Agents in the Industrial District European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2002; 9(4): 315 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
